Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://mgumus.chem.msu.ru/arw/book-content.doc
Дата изменения: Tue Oct 29 11:52:08 2002
Дата индексирования: Mon Oct 1 19:39:57 2012
Кодировка:

Поисковые слова: m 5

Title:
"Use of humic substances to remediate polluted environments: from theory to
practice".


Introduction
Perminova I.V. + ?? Remediation chemistry of humic substances (6 -8 pp)

Part 1. Impact of humic substances on speciation of heavy metals and
organic xenobiotics: implications for bioremediation technologies

1. Orlov, D.S., and Sadovnikova, L.K. Protective functions of humic
substances in the biosphere and practical use of humates. - 16-20 pp
2. Perminova I.V., Kulikova N.A., Kholodov V.A., Zhilin D.M., Grechishcheva
N.Yu. Binding properties of humic substances towards organic
ecotoxicants and heavy metals. - 16-20 pp.
3. Frimmel, F.H. Influence of oxidation on the metal-ion complexation of
NOM with respect to remediation. - 16-20 pp
4. Linnik P.N., Vasilchuk, T.A. Role of humic substances in the
complexation and detoxification of heavy metals (taking the Dnieper
reservoirs as example). - 8-10 pp
5. Moulin, V. Complexation of radionuclides with humic substances. - 16-20
pp.
6. Kalmykov, S.N., Scherbina N.S., Khasanova A.B., Novikov A.P. Humic
acids as barriers for actinide migration in the environment. - 8-10 pp.

Part 2. Impact of humic substances on interphase partitioning of
ecotoxicants: implications for permeable reactive barriers and flushing
technologies
2.1. Van Stempvoort, D. The use of aqueous humic substances in the in-situ
remediation of contaminated aquifers. - 16-20 pp
2.2. Balcke, G.U. et al The use of humic substances for creating permeable
reactive barriers ?? - 16-20 pp.
2.3. N.N.


Part 3. Impact of humic substances on the abiotic and biotic transformation
of ecotoxicants: implications for chemical and biological barriers

3.1. Field, J.A. Redox mediating properties of humic substances. - 8-10 pp.
3.2. Bollag, J.-M. Detoxification of contaminated soils via oxidative
coupling of organic ecotoxicants to humic substances. - 16-20 pp.
3.3. Jorobekova, Sh., et al. Influence of metal ions on the activity of
soil humics-enzyme complexes. - 16-20 pp.
3.4. Bezuglova, O.S. Use of humates and humate-enzyme complexes for the
detoxification of soils contaminated with heavy metals. - 16-20 pp.

Part 4. Impact of humic substances on plants under conditions of the
polluted environments: implications for phytoremediation technologies
4.1. Chen, Y. Impact of soil and compost humic substances on metal binding
and plant uptake. - 16-20 pp.
2. Gorovaya, A.I. Cytogenetic mechanism of humic substances action and its
implication for rehabilitation of polluted environments and human gene
pool under conditions of ecological crisis. - 16-20 pp.
3. Koroleva, O.V., Kulikova N.A. Physiological activity of humic
substances: biochemical aspects.
4. Kharitonov, M., Korbanyuk, R., Bulgakova M., Torkhova, N. Protective and
remediation effects of the humic substances against total pollutants
toxicity. - 8 - 10 pp.
5. Chukov, S.N. Physiological and bioprotecting activity of humic acids for
various steps of plant's organization. - 8-10 pp.

Part 5. Case studies: bioremediation and application of commercial humates.
5.1. De Kreuk, H. Advantages of in-situ remediation of polluted soil and
practical problems encountered during its performance.- 8-10 pp.
5.2. Thomas, H. - 8-10 pp.
5.3. Dias, S. M. - 8-10 pp.
5.4. Smith, S. Improvement of the biological degradability of wastewaters
using activated zeolites. - 8-10 pp.
5.5. Walia, D. Ask not what humic acid is, ask what it can do for us. - 8-
10 pp.
5.6. Iakimenko, O.S. Commercial humates from coal and their influence on
soil properties in model experiment - 8-10 pp.


Part 6. Elaboration of quantitative criteria for the quality of humic
substances and for efficacy of remediation

6.1. Hertkorn, N., and Schmitt-Kopplin, Ph. Analytical characterization of
humic substances and of their interaction with metal ions and organic
xenobiotica on a molecular level - 36-40 pp.
6.2. Gamble, D., Langford, C., Van Coopal, McGill ????? 16-20 pp
6.3. Perminova et al. Quantitative structure-activity relationships as a
way to obtaining the humic preparations with the predicted properties.-
16-20 pp
6.4. Hatfield, K., et al. Quantifying remediation - 8-10 pp.

Part 7. Prospects on application of humic substances in remediation
technologies
(Outcome of round-table discussion)
Perminova, I., Frimmel, F., Balcke, G., Koroleva, O. + ???