Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://hea-www.harvard.edu/~pgreen/FOS_WWW/electronic_table5.header_old Дата изменения: Mon Jul 8 20:05:25 2002 Дата индексирования: Tue Oct 2 06:01:37 2012 Кодировка: Поисковые слова: http www.astronomy.ru forum index.php topic 4644.0.html

Title: Emission Line Properties of AGN from a pre-COSTAR FOS HST Spectral Atlas
Authors: Kuraszkiewicz J., Green P.J., Forster K., Aldcroft T.L.,
Evans I.N., Koratkar A.
Table: Representative emission line measurements
================================================================================
Byte-by-byte Description of file: electronic_table5.ascii
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bytes Format Units Label Explanations
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
First line with source information:
1- 11 A11 --- Name Designation
12- 20 F9.5 --- z Redshift
Proceeded by 43 rows for emission line measurements - each row for one
emission line:
1-16 A16 --- Line Emission line name
17-23 I7 km/s FWHM Full width at half maximum of Line
24-30 I7 km/s E_FWHM positive error on FWHM
31-37 I7 km/s e_FWHM negative error on FWHM
38-44 I7 km/s Offset Gaussian emission line model peak offset from
the expected position (1)
45-51 I7 km/s E_Offset positive error on Offset
52-58 I7 km/s e_Offset negative error on Offset
59-67 F9.2 0.1nm EqWid Rest frame equivalent width of line (in {AA})
68-76 F9.2 0.1nm E_EqWid positive error on EqWid (2)
77-85 F9.2 0.1nm e_EqWid negative error on EqWid (2)
86-94 F9.2 erg/cm2/s Flux Observed emission line flux in units of
10$^{-14}$erg\,cm$^{-2}$\,s$^{-1}$
95-103 F9.2 E_Flux positive error on flux
104-112 F9.2 e-Flux negative error on flux
113-115 I3 --- Num Number of narrow absorption features used in
modeling the emission lines (3)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note (1): Note that no peak offset measurements appear for the iron emission
line measurements.
Note (2): Based on the 2{sigma} uncertainties in the amplitude and FWHM
of the Gaussian model and do not include an error from an
uncertainty in the underlying continuum flux level.
Note (3): Tabulated in the row of the closest emission line to the position of
the absorption feature.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------