Armagh Observatory, College Hill, Armagh BT61 9DG, +44 (0)28 3752 2928
Section II - Jeremiah Horrocks, Edmund Halley and the importance of the
Transits of Venus.
With the new and improved tables of planetary motion, Kepler was
able to predict the motions of the inferior planets, Mercury and
Venus, with greater accuracy than was previously possible. Whilst
so engaged, he discovered that both planets would occasionally
pass between the Earth and the Sun when they would appear as a
black dot against the bright surface of the Sun. He predicted that
transits of both Mercury and Venus would occur in 1631.
The transit of Mercury was seen by Pierre Gassendi in Paris on 7
November 1631, but the transit of Venus in the following month was
missed because it occurred during the European night. The first
actual observation of a Transit of Venus was made by Jeremiah
Horrocks in 1639, an outstandingly brilliant young mathematician
from Lancashire.
The suggestion that a Transit of Venus, observed from different
parts of the world, could be used to measure the actual distance
of the Earth from the Sun, was first made by James Gregory and Edmund
Halley, (Astronomer Royal 1720-1742). Such transits, where Venus
moves across the face of the Sun as seen from the Earth, occur twice
in every approximately 113 years, with the two transits separated by 8 years.
Transits of Venus occurred in 1761 and 1769, 1874 and 1882, and
will next occur in 2004 and 2012 AD.
The realisation that the transits of Venus could solve, what many
saw to be `the last great problem in astronomy' provoked enormous
interest in the 18th century, and even countries that technically
were at war (Great Britain and France) collaborated in this great
international scientific experiment. Expeditions were dispatched
to distant lands to observe the transits over as large a
geographical area as possible. Captain Cook was sent on his first
voyage to the Pacific by the Royal Society to observe the Transit
from the island of Tahiti. Other astronomers travelled to Africa
and throughout Europe to time the exact instant of transit. King
George III built himself an observatory at Kew specifically for
the purpose and Charles Mason travelled to Ireland to view the
transit from Donegal.
Click on image to enlarge.
11. Jeremiah Horrocks (1619-1641) An artist's impression of
Horrocks observing the Transit of Venus in 1639. Horrocks was
the first to realise that the Moon's orbit was elliptical and
made a number of other discoveries before his early death at the
age of 22. (Courtesy of the National Museums Liverpool - The Walker)
12. Mappemonde showing the areas of the globe where the 1769
transit would be visible. To improve the accuracy of the
measurements of the transit, it was necessary to make observations
simultaneously from sites widely separated in latitude. The
optimum regions to observe the transit were the South Pacific and
Northern Europe. The Royal Society decided to send observers to
the recently discovered Society Islands (Tahiti) and Northern
Norway. As local weather conditions could prevent observation at
the crucial times, it was important to disperse observers over a
reasonably large area. Partly for this reason, observations were
also made by the Royal Society from the townland of Cavan in
County Donegal.( Courtesy of the Melbourne Observatory)
13. Captain James Cook (1728-1779), by John Webber in 1776. Cook,
the explorer, was sent by the Royal Society to observe the
Transit of Venus of 1769 from Tahiti. In the course of his three
voyages to the Pacific basin he charted many unknown lands
including the East coast of Australia, New Zealand, various
Pacific islands and the West coast of North America. ( Courtesy of the National
Portrait Gallery)
14. Fort Venus, Tahiti. The Royal Society commissioned Charles
Green, an astronomer from the Royal Greenwich Observatory, to
travel with Captain Cook to the South Seas. In this contemporary
drawing we see the observatory set up by Cook on the principal
island of the archipelago, Tahiti, where the Transit observations
were made.
15. Monument that marks the spot on Venus
Point, Tahiti where the observations of the Transit of Venus were
conducted in 1769. (photo by C.J. Butler)
16. Morea a neighbouring island, where backup observations
were also carried out by Cooks' party. (photo by C.J. Butler)
17. Drawings of the Transit of Venus from Tahiti by Charles Green.
They show the characteristic distortion of the image of Venus when
near to the limb of the Sun. This made the timing of the exact
moment of contact difficult and compromised the results of the
observations.
18 Botanical Specimen The benefits to science and humanity of Cook's voyages were
not restricted to astronomy.On Captain Cook's first voyage, he was
joined by Joseph Banks the naturalist. Through the prodigious
efforts of Banks, the expedition made many botanical discoveries
that were new to science, including 1300 new species. The artists
on board recorded many of these specimens which were later
engraved for printing. This is one of over 900 engravings made of
botanical specimens which regrettably were never published for
financial reasons. The metal plates were subsequently lost and
only came to light during the second world war when they were
rediscovered in London. (Courtesy of James Trimble)
19. Charles Mason's Journal of Observations Charles Mason (1730-1786) was
an experienced astronomer who had been assistant at the Royal Greenwich
Observatory. With his partner Jeremiah Dixon, he had successfully observed the
Transit of Venus in 1761 from the Cape of Good Hope and, between 1764 and 1768,
had surveyed the boundary line between Maryland and Pennsylvania which was
subsequently known as the Mason-Dixon Line. Here we show the first page of his
diary of observations in Donegal leading up to and including the Transit of
Venus in 1769. (Courtesy of the Royal Astronomical Society)
20. Observations of Transit from Donegal Mason was chosen by the Royal Society to observe the 1769
transit from Donegal.
His observations were regarded by Maskelyne, the Astronomer Royal, as an
important contribution to the project because Dixon and others in Lapland
were clouded out.
Mason's careful preparatory work contains some
of the earliest accurate observations for the determination of
position carried out in Ireland. (Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society)
21. The King's Observatory at Richmond, Kew (1769) This building
was designed by Sir William Chambers for King George III
specifically for the royal family to observe the Transit of Venus
in 1769. It incorporates several features that derive from earlier
observatories in Sweden and Denmark. It was influential in the
design of the two Irish observatories at Dunsink and Armagh in
1785 and 1789, respectively. (photo by C.J. Butler)
22. King George III (c 1761) by Allan Ramsey King
George III was interested in many aspects of science and
particularly astronomy. His collection of scientific and
mathematical apparatus was extensive with much of it now preserved
in the Science Museum, South Kensington. Some items from his
astronomical collection, including the telescopes and clocks used
to observe the 1769 Transit of Venus were presented to Armagh
Observatory in 1840 by Queen Victoria, after the Kew Observatory
ceased to function. Some of them are on display here. (Courtesy of the National
Portrait Gallery)
23. Telescope (1768) by Thomas Short (1710-1768) used by George III to observe the Transit
of Venus in 1769.
It has several alternative configurations: Cassegrain,
Gregorian or Newtonian.
24. Quadrant by J. Sisson This instrument is also part of the
Kew Collection now housed at Armagh Observatory. It was probably used to
measure the altitude of Venus as it crossed the Sun in 1769.
25. Regulator by John Shelton With this clock, Dr Demainbray,
the Kings Astronomer timed the transit of 1769. It was one of
several made by Shelton for the Royal Society's expeditions to
observe the transit. One was taken by Captain Cook to Tahiti,
another by Dixon to Lapland and a third by Mason to Donegal.
26. Records of the Transit of Venus observed from Kew by Dr
Demainbray and members of the Royal family. They are remarkable for
their agreement, with only one second difference between all of the
observers, whereas at Greenwich, a similar set of observations
yielded a spread of times ranging over one minute. It must have
been difficult to disagree with the King. ( Courtesy of Kings College, London)