Pictures - an Astronomy Net Eyepieces Forum Message

Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.astronomy.net/forums/eyepieces/messages/488.shtml
Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Unknown
Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Sun Apr 10 01:54:37 2016
Êîäèðîâêà:
Ïîèñêîâûå ñëîâà: comet

Eyepieces Forum Message
Forums:	Atm · Astrophotography · Blackholes · Blackholes2 · CCD · Celestron · Domes · Education Eyepieces · Meade · Misc. · God and Science · SETI · Software · UFO · XEphem


Home \| Discussion Forums \| Eyepieces \| Post	Login

Pictures

Forum List | Follow Ups | Post Message | Back to Thread Topics | In Response To
Posted by Greg Eckes on November 1, 2003 07:07:59 UTC

Jarvis,
I got the pictures. Thanks!
1. What are the advantages to the new configuration? Is the scpop steady and no flex in the tube assembly?
2. Do you remember how the original telescope was collimated
3. what was the original position of the secondary in relation to the focuser and what is it now?
4. Did you off set the secondary?
5. How are the images before and after?

Greg

Follow Ups:

Pictures - jkoptic - November 2, 2003 - 05:23 UTC
- Pictures - gjeckes - November 2, 2003 - 08:06 UTC
  - Secondary offset - jkoptic - November 2, 2003 - 18:30 UTC
    - Secondary offset - gjeckes - November 2, 2003 - 21:41 UTC

Additional Information

About Astronomy Net | Advertise on Astronomy Net | Contact & Comments | Privacy Policy

Unless otherwise specified, web site content Copyright 1994-2016 John Huggins All Rights Reserved
Forum posts are Copyright their authors as specified in the heading above the post.
"dbHTML," "AstroGuide," "ASTRONOMY.NET" & "VA.NET"
are trademarks of John Huggins