9. 
              Astronomical Aspects of Creationism and Intelligent Design
             Fundamentalist 
              religious thinkers (from a number of religions) have sought to deny 
              the evidence from geology, astronomy, and evolutionary biology about 
              the age and gradual development of the universe, the Earth, and 
              its life-forms. (Recent creationist tactics have involved attacking 
              the Big Bang theory and radioactive dating, for example.) Some groups 
              have worked hard to get their own brand of "creation science" 
              or "intelligent design" into the public schools and 
              to undermine the teaching of evolution, one of the most fundamental 
              and best-established ideas in modern science. The literature examining 
              this controversy is enormous; the list below is merely a representative 
              sampling, of particular interest to astronomy educators. 
            An 
              Ancient Universe: How Astronomers Know the Vast Scale of Cosmic 
              Time: (from the Education Board of the American Astronomical Society) 
              http://www.aas.org/education/ancientuniverse.html 
               
            National 
              Center for Science Education: Best web site for keeping up with 
              issues in this area, with many articles, resources, and links. 
              http://www.ncseweb.org 
            Scott, 
              Eugenie Evolution Versus Creationism, 2nd ed. 2009, University 
              of California Press. Excellent introduction to the key issues -- 
              scientific and political. 
            Bobrowsky, 
              M. "Teaching Evolutionary Processes to Skeptical Students" 
              in Physics Teacher, Dec. 2000, p. 565. Includes a list of 
              creationist arguments and science teacher responses.  
            Bobrowsky, 
              M. "Dealing with Disbelieving Students on Issues of Evolutionary 
              Processes & Long Time Scales" Astronomy Education Review, 
              vol. 4, #1, pp. 95: 
              http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/AER2005007 
            Morrison, 
              D. "Only a Theory: Framing the Evolution/Creation Issue" 
              in Skeptical Inquirer, Nov/Dec. 2005, p. 37. An astronomer 
              comments on how scientists are ceding the field by not noting the 
              use of language. (On the web at: http://www.csicop.org/si/show/only_a_theory_framing_the_evolution_creation_issue/) 
            Hameed, 
              S. "Bracing for Islamic Creationism" in Science, 
              vol. 322, p. 1637 (12 Dec 2008). An astronomer warns of the rise 
              of creationist ideas in Muslim countries and the need for education. 
            Talk.Origins 
              Archive: (full of resources, discussions, links) 
              http://www.talkorigins.org 
               
            Supernovae, 
              Supernova Remnants, and Young Earth Creationism by Dave Moore: (How 
              creationists misuse arguments about exploding stars.) 
              http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/supernova/ 
               
            Lawson, 
              Kristan Darwin and Evolution for Kids. 2005, Chicago Review 
              Press. An introduction to Darwin’s life and key evolutionary 
              idea, with a discussion of why creationist ideas are wrong. 
            Pigliucci, 
              Massimo Denying Evolution: Creationism, Scientism, and the Nature 
              of Science. 2002, Sinauer Associates. A biologist gives the 
              history of, explains, and refutes the various "brands" 
              of creationism. 
            Strahler, 
              Arthur Science and Earth History: The Evolution / Creation Controversy. 
              1987, Prometheus Books. A discussion from the geologist's point 
              of view, with lots of information about dating the Earth's rocks. 
            Brush, 
              S. "Finding the Age of the Earth by Physics or by Faith?" 
              in Journal of Geological Education, 1982, vol. 30, pp. 34-58. 
            Coyne, 
              J. "The Faith That Dare Not Speak its Name: The Case Against 
              Intelligent Design" in The New Republic, Aug. 22/29, 
              2005 issue (vol. 233, issue 4727/8, p. 21.) Superb layperson’s 
              introduction to the history/politics of intelligent design and a 
              refutation of its arguments (by a biologist.) 
            Dutch, 
              S. "A Critique of Creationist Cosmology" in Journal 
              of Geological Education, 1982, vol. 30, p. 27. 
            Wilson, 
              M. "Geology Confronts Creationism: An Undergraduate Science 
              Curriculum" in Skeptical Inquirer, Jan/Feb. 2002, p. 
              52. A course for geology majors. 
            The 
              Age of the Earth: This useful page from the Talk.Origins site describes 
              how we measure the age of our planet and then dissects some of the 
              common creationist arguments for a younger Earth. 
              http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-age-of-earth.html 
            Changing 
              Speed of Light Analysis: Addresses the creationist idea that the 
              age of the universe could be a lot less than astronomers think if 
              the speed of light has been getting a lot slower with time, so that 
              light from distant objects wouldn’t have had to leave them 
              so long ago.  
              http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/c-decay.html 
              A 
              more technical site is:  
              http://homepage.mac.com/cygnusx1/cdecay/ 
               
            table 
            of contents  
            10. 
              The "Great Moon Hoax": Did Astronauts Land on the Moon?
             A 
              small group of "true believers" who claim that NASA 
              never landed on the Moon got a big boost in 2001, when Fox network 
              broadcast a long paranoid show about their ideas. The web sites 
              below provide a skeptical examination of this claim and the so-called 
              evidence for it. From the many moon rocks brought back by the astronauts 
              to the instruments they left on the Moon, there was always ample 
              evidence that the moon landings actually happened. But in 2009, 
              the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter took direct images showing the 
              Apollo artifacts on the Moon, settling the issue for all except 
              the most fervent "believers." 
            Phil 
              Plait’s response to "Moon Hoax": 
              http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html 
            Hoax 
              Comments by astronomer Jim Scotti: 
              http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/NOT_faked/ 
               
            Science 
              at NASA discussion of hoax: 
              http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2001/ast23Feb_2.htm 
               
            Moon 
              Base Clavius Site (a group effort at debunking) [note that you need 
              to click on the small arrows at the bottom to get to the next pages]: 
              http://www.clavius.org/site.html 
               
             Keel, 
              W. "The Earth and Stars in the Lunar Sky" in Skeptical 
              Inquirer, Jul/Aug. 2007, p. 47. The ultraviolet camera on Apollo 
              16 did record stars in the lunar sky and you can even identify them. 
             Plait, 
              Phil "Apalled at Apollo" Chapter 17 of Bad Astronomy. 
              2002, Wiley. Good ammunition for debunking the notion that NASA 
              never went to the Moon point by point. 
             Lunar 
              Reconnaissance Orbiter Images: 
              http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/LRO/multimedia/lroimages/apollosites.html 
               
            table 
            of contents  
              |