| Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес
оригинального документа
: http://www.astro.spbu.ru/DOP/8-GLIB/ASTNOTES/node6.html Дата изменения: Fri Nov 19 12:07:22 2010 Дата индексирования: Tue Oct 2 00:14:03 2012 Кодировка: Поисковые слова: rainbow | 
 
 
 
 
 
   
The behaviour of the polarization efficiency  (see Eq. (14))
for non-absorbing
and absorbing spheroids is shown in Fig. 11
for the case when a maximum polarization is expected (PF
alignment,
 (see Eq. (14))
for non-absorbing
and absorbing spheroids is shown in Fig. 11
for the case when a maximum polarization is expected (PF
alignment, 
 ). The chosen refractive indices are typical for water ice and soot. The
). The chosen refractive indices are typical for water ice and soot. The
 for these two
materials is different. The polarization efficiency grows with the aspect
ratio
 for these two
materials is different. The polarization efficiency grows with the aspect
ratio  and  is larger for oblate particles in comparison with
prolate ones of the same volume but the polarization reversal
takes place for disk-like particles. The last effect depends on the
imaginary part of the refractive index and appears for  absorbing
prolate particles of large sizes as well.
 and  is larger for oblate particles in comparison with
prolate ones of the same volume but the polarization reversal
takes place for disk-like particles. The last effect depends on the
imaginary part of the refractive index and appears for  absorbing
prolate particles of large sizes as well.
In Table 1, the values of the parameter 
 at  which  the polarization cross section
at  which  the polarization cross section  
 reach  a maximum  are  presented  for  icy
particles at
reach  a maximum  are  presented  for  icy
particles at 
 .
.
|   |   |   |   |   |   |   |   | 
| Prolate spheroid | |||||||
| 1.5 | 3.45 | 0.1036 | 0.057 | 0.30 | 0.26 | 3.40 | 0.99 | 
| 2.0 | 3.44 | 0.1536 | 0.092 | 0.30 | 0.23 | 3.41 | 0.99 | 
| 3.0 | 3.15 | 0.2036 | 0.157 | 0.28 | 0.19 | 3.42 | 1.08 | 
| 5.0 | 3.71 | 0.3510 | 0.241 | 0.32 | 0.19 | 3.76 | 1.01 | 
|   | 1.94 | 0.3552 | 0.184 | -- | 0.19 | 2.00 | 1.03 | 
| Oblate spheroid | |||||||
| 1.5 | 3.05 | 0.1210 | 0.067 | 0.27 | 0.31 | 2.97 | 0.97 | 
| 2.0 | 3.01 | 0.2237 | 0.124 | 0.26 | 0.34 | 3.05 | 1.01 | 
| 3.0 | 3.39 | 0.4052 | 0.176 | 0.30 | 0.43 | 3.38 | 1.00 | 
| 5.0 | 3.34 | 0.6342 | 0.298 | 0.29 | 0.50 | 3.41 | 1.02 | 
 is the radius  of  equivolume  sphere  corresponding to
 is the radius  of  equivolume  sphere  corresponding to
 if
 if 
 ;
;
 for prolate spheroids and
 for prolate spheroids and  for oblate spheroids;
 for oblate spheroids;
 For infinitely long cylinders the following quantities are given:
the parameter
 For infinitely long cylinders the following quantities are given:
the parameter 
 corresponding to
the maximum linear polarization
cross-section
 corresponding to
the maximum linear polarization
cross-section 
 , polarizing  efficiency,
the cylinder radius
, polarizing  efficiency,
the cylinder radius  for
 for 
 multiplied by the factor 1.145 (see Sect. 1.1),
the parameter
multiplied by the factor 1.145 (see Sect. 1.1),
the parameter  at which the circular polarization changes
the sign, and the ratio
 at which the circular polarization changes
the sign, and the ratio 
 .
.
 were  obtained
without smoothing the curves of
 were  obtained
without smoothing the curves of 
 .
From Table 1,  one can see that the growth  of
.
From Table 1,  one can see that the growth  of   leads  to an increase  of the polarization cross-sections
and  the polarizing  efficiency  of the medium, but the particle volume does not change
strongly. With increasing
leads  to an increase  of the polarization cross-sections
and  the polarizing  efficiency  of the medium, but the particle volume does not change
strongly. With increasing  ,  the  optical  properties  of  prolate
spheroids and infinitely long cylinders become similar.
,  the  optical  properties  of  prolate
spheroids and infinitely long cylinders become similar.
It is also seen from  Fig. 11
that  relatively large particles produce
no polarization independently of their shape.
For absorbing particles,  it occurs at smaller  values
than for non-absorbing  ones. However, the position at which the ratio
 values
than for non-absorbing  ones. However, the position at which the ratio
 reaches a maximum is rather stable in every panel of Fig. 11
independently of
 reaches a maximum is rather stable in every panel of Fig. 11
independently of  .
.
 decreases,
the position of the maximum for
 decreases,
the position of the maximum for  shifts to smaller values of
shifts to smaller values of  while that for
 while that for
 shifts to larger
 shifts to larger  (Fig. 12, upper panels).
As a result, the maximum  polarization efficiency for prolate spheroids
is reached for smaller
(Fig. 12, upper panels).
As a result, the maximum  polarization efficiency for prolate spheroids
is reached for smaller  in the case of tilted orientation
(Fig. 12, lower left panel). And the picture is reversed for
oblate particles (see Fig. 13).
 in the case of tilted orientation
(Fig. 12, lower left panel). And the picture is reversed for
oblate particles (see Fig. 13).
Thus, it should be emphasized that
for particles  larger than the radiation wavelength,
the linear polarization is expected to be rather small. This does not
allow one to distinguish between the particle properties like refractive index,
shape, orientation. Even in the case of ideal (PF) orientation,
large particles (possibly available in dark clouds, -
see Fig. 32 and discussion in Sect. 3.3.1  in Voshchinnikov [2002])
do not polarize the transmitted radiation.
So, the decrease of the ratio  with the rise
of
 with the rise
of  like found by Clayton and Cardelli ([1988])
should imply only that large grains  are not efficient at producing
polarization and is not connected with the change of grain shape
or their less efficient alignment.
 like found by Clayton and Cardelli ([1988])
should imply only that large grains  are not efficient at producing
polarization and is not connected with the change of grain shape
or their less efficient alignment.
However, there is a possibility of reducing of the polarization efficiency
associated with growth of the spherical icy  mantles on non-spherical
cores in dark clouds.  In Fig. 14,
this effect is illustrated for  spheroidal particles
with astrosil core  and water ice  mantle.
The influence of variations of the mantle shape  for particles of different
sizes  is shown.
The shape of the core was fixed and for each curve the shape of the mantle remains
the same. In this case, the
ratio of the core volume to that of the particle
does not change. For the values of  (core) used, it is rather small
(from 0.11 to 0.004) and, therefore, the core's influence appears for
particles of small radii only. For particles larger than
(core) used, it is rather small
(from 0.11 to 0.004) and, therefore, the core's influence appears for
particles of small radii only. For particles larger than 
 ,
the polarization seems to be mainly determined by the shape of the
particle mantle.
,
the polarization seems to be mainly determined by the shape of the
particle mantle.
Values of the ratio  presented in Figs. 11-14
are usually much larger than the upper limit for the interstellar polarization given by
Eq. (3.42) in Voshchinnikov [2002]:
 presented in Figs. 11-14
are usually much larger than the upper limit for the interstellar polarization given by
Eq. (3.42) in Voshchinnikov [2002]:
 .
In order to reduce the ratio
.
In order to reduce the ratio  , the imperfect orientation of dust
grains  should be considered. Note that the PDG orientation
(in comparison with PF)
should reduce the polarization of prolate grains  only
as PF and PDG orientations for oblate grains are equivalent
(see Eq. (16)).
It is interesting that the polarization efficiency
created by rotating ellipsoidal particles  is lower than that of oblate spheroids
and sometimes even prolate spheroids (Fig. 15)4.
Taking into account the problems with grain alignment in dark
clouds  (e.g., Lazarian et al., [1997]), the hope to solve the problem
of the origin of polarization with the aid of more complex three-dimensional
particles looks like unfounded.
, the imperfect orientation of dust
grains  should be considered. Note that the PDG orientation
(in comparison with PF)
should reduce the polarization of prolate grains  only
as PF and PDG orientations for oblate grains are equivalent
(see Eq. (16)).
It is interesting that the polarization efficiency
created by rotating ellipsoidal particles  is lower than that of oblate spheroids
and sometimes even prolate spheroids (Fig. 15)4.
Taking into account the problems with grain alignment in dark
clouds  (e.g., Lazarian et al., [1997]), the hope to solve the problem
of the origin of polarization with the aid of more complex three-dimensional
particles looks like unfounded.
 
 
 
 
