NASA Johnson
Space Center Oral History Project
Edited Oral History Transcript
Harrison
H. "Jack" Schmitt
Interviewed
by Carol Butler
Houston, Texas – 14 July 1999
Butler:
Today is [July] 14th, 1999. This oral history is with Dr. Harrison
Schmitt, who was commonly referred to as “Jack” by his
colleagues at NASA at the time. Dr. Schmitt is here at the Johnson
Space Center in Houston, Texas. This interview is being conducted
for the Johnson Space Center Oral History Project by Carol Butler.
Thank you for joining us today.
Schmitt: It’s my pleasure. And congratulations on getting this
project going finally.
Butler: Thank you. Thank you. It’s a fascinating project. It’s
wonderful just to be able to have a chance to talk to you and your
colleagues and get your oral histories down. Today we’d like
to start with talking about how you first got interested in planetary
geology.
Schmitt: Well, I had no overriding interest other than in the planet
we call the Earth until I was looking for a job in 1964; and I sent
a letter to Eugene [M.] Shoemaker of the US Geological Survey, one
of the foremost planetologists that has ever lived. And he, it turns
out, had sent me a letter almost simultaneously [after] looking at
the list of people who had taken and done reasonably well on the US
Geological Survey exam. And so, since there was a depression in most
other parts of geology, I decided to go out and work with Gene.
It was aided by knowing many of the people that Gene had attracted
to his group that had, by that time, become known as the Branch of
Astrogeology within the US Geological Survey. People like Danny [Daniel]
Milton and Newell Trask and Don [E.] Wilhelms and others who I had
known for other reasons, and really very, very strong individuals
in their science. And it was clearly a credible group to go work for.
I had met Gene some years before in—when I was introduced to
him, it was by a hard rock geologist, more in tune with what I was
working on at the time, who said, “You have to go down the hall
and see what this crazy guy Eugene Shoemaker’s working on. He’s
trying to map the Moon!” Well, indeed Gene did instigate the—that
effort—modern effort—of mapping the Moon; and, much to
the excitement of the Apollo astronauts and the Apollo managers when
they finally decided that we were going to land there, that background
was extremely important.
But that really triggered it. I had become interested somewhat in—in
spaceflight after leaving Caltech [California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, California] and going to Norway in 1957 as a Fulbright student.
And like so many people, when Sputnik was launched in the
fall of 1957 (October 1957), it caught my attention. But it particularly
caught the attention of the other students, from all—from countries
all over the world, who were in residence at the University of Oslo.
And that’s what triggered my interest, more maybe than—even
than the technical achievement, because at Caltech we had been around
people who were going off to work in the missile industry and things
like that. And so, rockets were not an unusual phenomenon to us. But
the degree to which the then Soviet Union’s success with a artificial
satellite of the Earth, Sputnik 1, influenced and excited
and literally scared the students who were around at that time from
all over the world. That really did get my attention about how important
space almost certainly was going to be in the future of humankind.
And so, I was more interested in a general sense than I was in actually
ever thinking about participating directly myself. And really that
thought didn’t occur—well, it occurred once in a jocular
vein when the National Academy of Sciences put out a report (I believe
it was) probably in the very early ’60s (I was still at the
Harvard Geological Museum as a graduate student). And that report
said the—it was done for NASA, and that report said that it—the
first person on the Moon should be a hard rock geologist. Well, of
course, all the geologists in Harvard and probably everywhere else
that had wind of that report cheered and said, “Yeah! That’s
right.” And then we promptly forgot about the whole thing because
nobody was—it was sort of a joke.
But in 1964, while I was working in my early time with the US Geological
Survey in Flagstaff, Arizona, NASA and the National Academy of Sciences
asked for volunteers for the fourth group of astronauts who were to
be scientist-astronauts. And I thought about 10 seconds and raised
my hand and volunteered. Primarily because I felt—I can remember
feeling, at the time, that if I didn’t volunteer, no matter
what happened to my application, that I’d almost certainly regret
it when human beings actually went to the Moon.
Butler: Well, it looks like that volunteering turned out pretty good
for you in the long run.
Schmitt: Well, I was very lucky, very fortunate. And I think all the
astronauts of that era, whatever they may say now, really were accidents.
We happened to be at the right place at the right time. Unlike today,
where young people can career-plan to become astronauts and go through
several applications and every 2 years or so they can have that opportunity,
we—it was presented to us in a very spontaneous way for the
most part. And although some people applied two or three times on
the pilot side, we were the first group of scientist-astronauts. And
it really—we were an accident. And I think most of the astronauts
have to say (if not all of them)—have to say that if they really
were true to what happened, they were accidents. Not very many people
can claim—like Eugene Shoemaker could claim that he had dreamed
of going to the Moon from the time he was a child. (There’s
no question that he did.) Unfortunately, he was not qualified medically
in order to volunteer for that group.
Butler: It must’ve been challenging for him to have been—be
able to help you all that were applying, and to help you get into
the program in that way.
Schmitt: Well, he seemed to get a big kick out of it. Some regrets,
I’m sure, for not being there himself. But he certainly, in
those early years, gave heart and soul to trying to organize and stimulate
NASA to put together a true field geology experiment for the Apollo
Program. And ultimately, we did that. He was disappointed in how sophisticated
it was for its time. But nevertheless if he hadn’t been pushing,
people like George [M.] Low and Gene [Eugene F.] Kranz and even [Gen.]
Sam [Samuel C.] Phillips at Headquarters would have had a harder time
selling the kinds of things we ultimately did.
Butler: As you were going through the selection process to become
a scientist-astronaut, as you said, the new group and it was a new
realm that NASA hadn’t selected anyone for before, what was
that process? What did you do? Can you tell us about that?
Schmitt: Well, roughly, I believe the announcement of opportunity
for the scientist-astronaut program, the first selection, came out
in November of 1964 (if I remember correctly). And about 1400 young
scientists applied—scientists and engineers, essentially none
of whom were women, which is interesting when you—later on,
we’ll talk about the situation today. Or how that changed. Out
of that 1400, based on a Federal Aviation Administration flight physical
that we all had to submit with our application, NASA took that number
down to (as I recall) about 400; and those 400 were asked to send
in some additional information. I believe it was published papers
and things of that nature. Transcripts.
Stuff to establish their academic credentials. And from that second
submission, then 80 (I believe) were selected to be reviewed by a
committee of the National Academy of Sciences. And those 80 also were
asked to submit additional written material, an essay that I recall
about “What would you do if you were suddenly on the Moon?”
I don’t recall exactly what I said, but I was deeply involved
in working on those kinds of problems for Dr. Shoemaker. And so, I
suspect that it had a little bit more knowledge and information in
it than the average applicant would have had a chance to do. Or to
provide.
From that 80, 16 then were selected by the National Academy, submitted
to NASA to then take a physical at the Brooks Air Force Base [San
Antonio, Texas], where those physicals were being given at that time.
It was an 8-day physical; 15 of the 16 showed up. I don’t recall
the 16th’s name or anything at this point—but that would
be available somewhere—but he apparently decided that he really
wasn’t as interested in this program as he thought he was when
he put in this application. So, the 15 candidates then went through
that physical, came down, and were interviewed by a group of NASA
managers here. I know Al [Alan B.] Shepard [Jr.] and Deke [Donald
K.] Slayton were in that group. Max [Maxime A.] Faget was there. I
would have to, again, refer to the records of all the people that
were interviewing us. Oh, Chuck [Charles A.] Berry, the flight surgeon,
was obviously in the room. And based on that, six were selected then
as astronauts.
At that time, they didn’t have any of this idiocy of calling
people “candidate astronauts.” Once you were selected,
you were an astronaut. And I have argued with the local powers that
be here and tried to foment rebellion within the astronaut corps not
to allow themselves to be called “candidate astronauts.”
It’s ridiculous, this! If somebody’s not going to qualify
and not going to make it, they’re not going to make it. You
don’t have to call them a candidate to prove that they’re
on probation. It’s a bit demeaning.
At any rate, these six of us were then put in a position where we
had to qualify as pilots. As everybody should know, everybody in the
Apollo spacecraft really needed to operate as a pilot-astronaut as
well as whatever else they might have been in their previous life.
And so, four of us who had no previous pilot experience (or at least
not jet pilot experience) were sent to Williams Air Force Base [Chandler,
Arizona] for jet pilot training. Two, Joe [Joseph P.] Kerwin and Curt
[F. Curtis] Michel, had previous flying experience. Joe had just qualified
as a Navy carrier pilot, as a flight surgeon-pilot; and Curt Michel
had been in the Air Force and flew F-86s (if I remember correctly)
during the Korean conflict. So, he just had to get back into thinking
about being a pilot again.
The other group—consisting of Owen [K.] Garriott, Ed [Edward
G.] Gibson, Duane [F.] Graveline, and myself—then were sent
to Williams Air Force Base for what’s called—was called
their Undergraduate Pilot Training Program. And about 3 weeks after
we arrived out there—actually, the news broke even before we
were sent. But Duane Graveline ran into a bit of a problem (it turned
out for him a great problem) in that his wife sued for divorce. And
that, at that time, was not a very acceptable position to be in; and
he resigned after about 3 weeks of pilot training. So, the other three
(Garriott, Gibson, and myself) remained at Williams Air Force Base
and went through the full Pilot Training Program. Except for the military
instruction that the Air Force cadet-pilots had to go through.
Most of our group, the class of ’[19]67A, were Air Force Academy
graduates. So, it was a really remarkable group of young men that
were going through pilot training, all of whom were about 10 years
younger than we were. So, I would—became terribly impressed,
not only with the quality of the people that were becoming pilots
in the Air Force, but the unbelievable (in my estimation and experience)
professionalism of the Air Force training staff—the Captains
and Majors, for the most part (some Lieutenants), that were part of
Air Training Command and just did a really remarkable and highly professional
job. They really—you can understand why American pilots do as
well as they do in combat as well as in peacetime, because of the
quality of the training they’re getting.
Butler: That’s very good to hear. While you were down there,
how was the environment for you? This was obviously new for them to
have scientist-astronauts come train with them, and new for you as
well, not having had the pilot training before. What was it like from
both sides?
Schmitt: Well, I, of course, don’t know the Air Force side.
I’m sure they had some difficulties putting up with these three
civilians who appeared on the base. If I remember correctly, we were
told we were the first civilians ever to receive Air Force pilot wings
and—after our 54 weeks of training. The Air Force seemed to
tolerate us. We were probably a bit of a thorn in their side, because
we could not be disciplined in the same way that the military pilots.
They could just tell NASA, “We don’t want them anymore,”
I guess, and then deal with NASA at that point.
From our perspective, I think we fit in very well. We were spread
academically throughout the class in terms of the—well, I believe
that Ed Gibson graduated number 2 in our class (if I remember correctly).
(He’ll have to verify that.) Owen Garriott was a bit higher.
I was a bit farther down. I had a harder time learning how to fly
these things, particularly on instruments, than the others did—for
whatever reason that was. Eventually, I succeeded. But it was a bit
traumatic for me to try to work my way through that.
And in the middle of all this, just as we transitioned from T-37s
to T-38s, in a basketball game I broke my elbow. So, I had to sit
down for a few weeks while that elbow healed, and then try to catch
up. (Which I ultimately did.) But it meant an awful lot of flying,
awfully fast. Which was fine. That’s the best way to learn,
I think, is just to get all your flying in at once.
Butler: Jump right in there and do it.
Schmitt: But we, I think, had a good—I think everybody was satisfied
with the relationship with the Air Force. They continued to do that
for the next group that came on board a couple of years later. And
I really, personally, cannot speak too highly of the quality of the
training that we received. It really was a remarkable experience.
Butler: Good. Going back a little bit, when you did learn of your
selection to become an astronaut, what were your thoughts at the time?
Schmitt: Well, I learned about my selection about 3 days before anybody
else. And that was a result of a phone call from a consultant to NASA
who was basically the head of aerospace medicine for NASA—Dr.
[W.] Randolph Lovelace [II]—who had a clinic in Albuquerque
[New Mexico]. I’d never met him before and, unfortunately, did
not meet him afterwards. (He was killed as a result—or died
as a result of an airplane accident about 6 months after this all
happened.) But I was in my office in Flagstaff; and Fern Beeson, my
secretary, informed me that a Dr. Randolph Lovelace was on the phone
and wished to talk to me. And I sort of vaguely knew who he was because
of my New Mexico connections; and so, I talked to him. And his first
words were, “You don’t have to worry about anything. You’re
in.”
Well, what he was referring to is that both the Air Force doctors
and the NASA doctors were a bit taken aback that I had had, in 1960
(and we’re talking about 1965 now)—in 1960, I had had
what’s called a partial colectomy in order to repair a congenital
defect in my intestines; namely what’s called a malrotation.
And as you can imagine, Air Force doctors and NASA doctors, who are
used to eliminating anybody with any abnormality, were not too enthusiastic
(as I gathered) about my becoming an astronaut. But Dr. Lovelace apparently
was asked to review the case. He went to the surgeon—a Dr. Claude
Welch, a famous surgeon at Massachusetts General Hospital, who did
the surgery back in 1960—and they reviewed it and concluded
that I would, as in Dr. Lovelace’s words, “would be better
off than anybody else because of the geometry of my intestinal tract.”
And so, he said, “You’re in.” So, that—I guess
he figured that I had been concerned that I was going to be eliminated
on the basis of that operation. It turns out, I think, that everybody
in our group had something that potentially could have eliminated
them if you applied the strict standards that the Air Force normally
would apply to a young pilot. But 10 years is a long time physiologically,
as I’ve learned more about it subsequently; and where in your—when
you’re 18 or 19 or 20, you will look extremely qualified physically,
10 years later almost everybody has something that you can find out
about them that might disqualify them. Whether it’s eyesight
or a bout of osteomyelitis, which one of the people had and came through
okay on, but another didn’t. And so, it was a—I didn’t
envy NASA in trying to make these kind of decisions for people who
were in their late 20s and early 30s.
Butler: Human body’s pretty intricate. Once you got through
with the pilot training, what did you move on to next? Is that when
you moved down to Houston?
Schmitt: We immediately came down and took up training, general training—classes
primarily—and tours and familiarization with the Saturn Vs and
stuff like that with the fifth group of astronauts, who had been selected
while we were in pilot training. These were pilots that basically
we ended up being in the same training class with them, even though
we were senior by one group. Because of the pilot training, we had
to go through the classes with them.
And so, the first year probably (maybe even more, again you—all
of this tends to merge into a haze with time), but we were training
in a wide variety of engineering and spaceflight courses with the
fifth group of astronauts. This included people like Fred [W.] Haise
[Jr.] and Vance [D.] Brand and Jack [John L.] Swigert. That whole
group of people who really became the second wave of the Apollo astronauts.
I was the only one of our group that ended up being directly involved
in Apollo. But most of the pilots who were in that sixth group did
have some direct or indirect role in Apollo.
After that (and during that time)—again, in those days once
you were selected as an astronaut, they expected you to perform at
an immediately high level and at the old 8-day week/16-hour days that
everybody else in the Apollo Program was performing at. And so, we
also took on some assignments from the Astronaut Office to oversee
certain aspects of the engineering or operations of the Apollo Program
as it was developing. That was a very, very important part of the
success of Apollo.
And I don’t think it’s gotten nearly enough credit, of
what Al Shepard and Deke Slayton decided to do with the astronauts
who weren’t directly involved in flights. Weren’t assigned
to flights. And they were—maybe partly because, “What
else do we do with them?” but partly because I think their insight
was correct. In that having astronauts who were going to be at the
tip of the spear, part of the review teams, part of the Critical Design
Reviews, getting very familiar with certain aspects of the spacecraft,
the rockets, and the planning and operations of Apollo, was extremely
important in making it real to everybody else that people are actually
going to use these things that we’re building.
It was a, you know—in a way—an adjunct—an important
adjunct to the Snoopy Progr