Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://mirror.msu.net/pub/rfc-editor/rfc-ed-all/museum/IAB/slides/tsld004.htm
Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Fri Jul 18 08:18:44 1997
Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Sat Feb 12 05:29:34 2011
Êîäèðîâêà:

Standards process (2)

Standards process (2)

Debates leading to consensus are rough and tough and open to anybody

Complete running software is obligatory to advance on standards track

Emphasis is on technical clarity and simplicity

Standards go through [experimental], proposed, and draft standard status before approval as Internet Standards (see rfc 1602/1871)

All approvals are by formal IESG vote with appeals to IAB (see rfc1601)

No procedures are national or regional

Previous slide Next slide Back to first slide View graphic version