Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес
оригинального документа
: http://theory.sinp.msu.ru/comphep_html/tutorial/node114.html
Дата изменения: Tue Aug 15 14:57:18 2000 Дата индексирования: Mon Oct 1 22:52:51 2012 Кодировка: |
Every time when we are trying to create a model containing a massive vector particle we meet a problem caused by bad asymptotics of its propagator
The factor gives a projection on physical degrees of freedom in the polarization space. This term appears because a 4-component vector field is used to describe a particle with 3 degrees of freedom. The term leads to a fast growth of amplitudes at high energies, what breaks unitarity and is not compatible with the renormalizability of theory.
The problem mentioned above is solved in the framework of gauge field theories where the gauge symmetry is responsible for mutual cancellation of rapidly growing contributions of separate diagrams [Bjorken&Drell]. Let our model of particle interaction be based on a gauge theory. Then on a step of numerical evaluation we expect a cancellation of contributions which come from various Feynman diagrams. Consequently, finite precision numerical calculations may lead to wrong results. Accompanying problem is a cumbersome expression for each diagram as a result of appearance of mutually canceling terms.
At the same time there is a freedom in formulation of Feynman rules
for gauge theories caused by an ambiguity of gauge fixing terms [Bjorken&Drell].
These terms modify the quadratic
part of the Lagrangian and consequently may improve the vector
particle propagator. Indeed, in the case of t'Hooft-Feynman gauge the
propagator of vector particle takes the form
A price for this solution is an appearance of three
additional unphysical particles in the model. They are
a couple of Faddeev-Popov ghosts and one Goldstone ghost.
All of them have scalar type propagators with the same mass .
Opposite to (1) the propagator (2)
does not vanish when it projected onto the temporal polarization state
Generally the t'Hooft-Feynman gauge solves the problem of
cancellations. But while calculating
processes with incoming or outgoing massive vector particles,
we meet a similar problem. Indeed, we need to multiply
the diagram contributions by polarization vectors. The polarization
vectors constitute an orthonormal basis
in the sub-space orthogonal to a momentum . Due to the relation
(5) |
The first two vectors correspond to transversal polarizations and the third one corresponds to a longitudinal one. We see that the longitudinal vector has large ( of order of ) components. It may imply a fast increase of cross-sections of processes with the longitudinal polarizations at high energies or an appearance of cancellations between various diagrams. Indeed the second case is realized and, hence, we have got a problem with diagram cancellations. When evaluating squared diagrams we get cumbersome expressions again as a result of substitution of the projector (4).