Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://mccmb.belozersky.msu.ru/2013/abstracts/abstracts/213.pdf
Дата изменения: Mon Jun 3 19:36:04 2013
Дата индексирования: Thu Feb 27 21:11:11 2014
Кодировка:
Discriminative selection of alternative disease-modifying treatment in multiple sclerosis patients E. Tsareva
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ostrovityanov str., 1, 117997, Moscow, Russia, kateritsa@gmail.com

O. Kulakova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ostrovityanov str., 1, 117997, Moscow, Russia, olga.koulakova@gmail.com

D. Lvovs
Research Institute for Genetics and Selection of Industrial Microorganisms , 1-st Dorozhniy pr., 1, 117545, Moscow, Russia dmitrijs.lvovs@gmail.com

A. Favorov
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 733 North Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205-2196, USA favorov@sensi.org

A. Boyko
Moscow City Multiple Sclerosis Center, Dvintsev str., 6, 127018, Moscow, Russia boykoa13@gmail.com

O. Favorova
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Ostrovityanov str., 1, 117997, Moscow, Russia, olga_favorova@gmail.com

Background. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease of the central nervous system, which requires the long-term medication with specific disease modifying treatments (DMTs). The first-line immunomodulatory drugs interferon-beta (IFNb) and glatiramer acetate (GA) have been shown to reduce the disease activity. However the significant share of MS patients remains resistant to the therapy used. Diverse genetic background may define the variable therapy response. For discriminative selection of preferable first-line DMT we performed the comparative pharmacogenetic analysis in MS patients treated either with IFNb or GA. Unified set of immune-response genes, which are relevant for IFNb and/or GA modes of action, and identical clinical criteria of treatment


response were used. Materials and Methods. 253 IFNb-treated unrelated MS patients and 285 GA-treated MS patients were studied (Moscow region residents of Russian ethnicity). The patients with event-free status during no less than 2 years of DMT course were classified as clinically optimal responders (Rs); other patients were classified as non-optimal responders (NRs). In this study we compared the distribution of alleles/genotypes/allelic combinations differing in carriage between IFNb responders and GA responders. A comparison between IFNb nonresponders and GA non-responders was performed in order to confirm the found associations as well. The allelic sets, of which carriage was associated with discriminative DMT response, were identified using APSampler algorithm with subsequent validation by means of the exact Fisher's (pf) and permutation (p
perm)

tests. Functional polymorphisms in the following

candidate genes were studied: DRB1 HLA class II, IFNB1 (rs1051922), IFNAR1 (rs1012335), IFNG (rs2430561), TNF (rs1800629), TGFB1 (rs1800469), IL7RA (rs6897932), CCR5 (rs333) and CTLA4 (rs231775). Results. We have found that discriminative polymorphic variants of CCR5, IFNAR1, TGFB1, DRB1 and CTLA4 genes provide the preferable choice of IFNb or GA for MS patients. Some discriminative composite markers, of which carriage in Russians is beneficial for MS individuals on IFNb treatment whereas detrimental for those on GA treatment were identified. As compared to our previous conventional pharmacogenetics studies on IFNb and GA treatment response, it can be concluded that certain genes found upon conventional pharmacogenetic studies cannot be considered as discriminative genetic markers of IFNb versus GA treatment response. Conclusions. Our study provides an option for identification of promising prognostic composite genetic markers for first-line immunomodulatory treatment selection for individual MS patients.