Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://mirror.msu.net/pub/rfc-editor/internet-drafts/draft-matsuhira-m4p6e-00.txt
Дата изменения: Thu Feb 4 09:16:27 2016
Дата индексирования: Sun Apr 10 06:33:35 2016
Кодировка:



Network Working Group N. Matsuhira
Internet-Draft Fujitsu Limited
Intended status: Informational February 4, 2016
Expires: August 7, 2016


Multiple IPv4 address and port number - IPv6 address mapping
encapsulation (M4P6E)
draft-matsuhira-m4p6e-00

Abstract

This document specifies Multiple IPv4 address and port number - IPv6
address mapping encapulation (M4P6E) specification.

Requirements Language

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119].

Status of this Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on August 7, 2016.

Copyright Notice

Copyright (c) 2016 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.

This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect



Matsuhira Expires August 7, 2016 [Page 1]

Internet-Draft M4P6E February 2016


to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.


Table of Contents

1. Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Architecture of M4P6E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. M4P6E address format . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
4. Using M4P6E in client server environments . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.1. Client environments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4.2. Server environments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.3. Data Center Environments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. Port Number Issue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
6. IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8.2. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7





























Matsuhira Expires August 7, 2016 [Page 2]

Internet-Draft M4P6E February 2016


1. Introduction

This document provides Multiple IPv4 address and port number - IPv6
address mapping encapulation (M4P6E) base specification.

M4P6E provide IPv4 address sharing function without Network Address
Translation (NAT [RFC1631]). M4P6E require IPv6 network.


2. Architecture of M4P6E

Figure 1 shows M4P6E address architecture. M4P6E address consists
four parts, M4P6E prefix, IPv4 network plane ID, IPv4 address, and
Port number.


| | | | |
| 80 - m bits | m bits | 32 bits | 16 bits |
+----------------------+----------------+----------------+----:----+
| M4P6E prefix | IPv4 network | IPv4 address | port |
| | plane ID | | number |
+----------------------+----------------+----------------+----:----+
|<--------------- Locator (128 -n bits )-------------------->:<-->|
| : ID |
| (n bits)


Figure 1

In M4P6E, boundary of locator and identifier is in port number part,
that mean, M4P6E use upper part of port number as locator, and lower
part of port number as identifier.


3. M4P6E address format

Figure 2 show a example of M4P6E address format. In this example,
16bits IPv4 network plane ID is used, that provide 65535 IPv4 network
plane.



| 3 | 45bits | 16bits | 16 bits| 32bits | 16 bits |
+---+------------------+---------+---------+------------+---------+
|001| routing prefix |subnet id| plane ID|IPv4 address| Port # |
+---+------------------+---------+----------------------+---------+





Matsuhira Expires August 7, 2016 [Page 3]

Internet-Draft M4P6E February 2016


Figure 2


4. Using M4P6E in client server environments

4.1. Client environments

Figure 3 shows a example of M4P6E usage in client environments. In
this document, NAPT is IPv4 - IPv4 Netowrk address and port number
translator. Coopetation with NAPT, M4P6E provide IPv4 address
sharing with different users.


+--------------+
| | +---------+ +--------+ +---------+
| +----| M4P6E |--| NAPT |--+--| Clients |
| | +---------+ +--------+ | +---------+
| | | +---------+
| | +--| Clients |
| Backbone | | +---------+
| | :
| | | +---------+
| Network | +--| Clients |
| | +---------+
| |
| | +---------+ +--------+ +---------+
| +----| M4P6E |--| NAPT |--+--| Clients |
| | +---------+ +--------+ | +---------+
| | | +---------+
| | +--| Clients |
| | | +---------+
| | :
| | | +---------+
| | +--| Clients |
| | +---------+
: : : : :
| | +---------+ +--------+ +---------+
| +----| M4P6E |--| NAPT |--+--| Clients |
| | +---------+ +--------+ | +---------+
| | | +---------+
| | +--| Clients |
| | | +---------+
| | :
| | | +---------+
| | +--| Clients |
| | +---------+
+--------------+




Matsuhira Expires August 7, 2016 [Page 4]

Internet-Draft M4P6E February 2016


Figure 3

4.2. Server environments

Figure 4 shows an example of M4P6E usage in server environments. In
this example, server terminate M4P6E tunnel. This case, Server
require at least one port number per server, that mean, 128bits host
route advertise for server access via IPv4. This case, full access
is provided via IPv6.

+--------------+
| | +------------+
| +----|Server with |
| | |M4P6E |
| Backbone | |function |
| | +------------+
| | +------------+
| Network +----|Server with |
| | |M4P6E |
| | |function |
| | +------------+
: : :
| | +------------+
| +----|Server with |
| | |M4P6E |
| | |function |
| | +------------+
+--------------+


Figure 4

4.3. Data Center Environments

Figure 5 shows an example of M4P6E usage in Data Center environments.
In this example, M4P6E is used only in Data Center Backend Network
closely. Client which is connected via backbone network does not
know the exists of M4P6E. M4P6E can provide at least one port number
per server, this case, 128bits host route is advertised, however this
route in advertised only in data center backbone network. Ofcource,
IPv6 address may allocated to the server, so full access is provided
via IPv6.









Matsuhira Expires August 7, 2016 [Page 5]

Internet-Draft M4P6E February 2016


.
+--------+ . +-------+
| | +-------+ . | | +-----------------+
| +--+ | . | |-| Server w/M4P6E |
| | | Data | . | Data | +-----------------+
|Backbone+--+Center | +----------+ |Center | +-----------------+
| | | +--| M4P6E |--+ |-| Server w/M4P6E |
| | |Front | +----------+ |Backend| +-----------------+
|Network | |Network| . |Network| +-----------------+
| | | | +----------+ | |-| Server w/M4P6E |
| | | +--| M4P6E |--+ | +-----------------+
| | | | +----------+ | | +-----------------+
: : : : . | |-| Server w/M4P6E |
| | | | . | | +-----------------+
| | | | . | | :
| | | | . | | +-----------------+
| | | | . | |-| Server w/M4P6E |
| | +-------+ . | | +-----------------+
+--------+ . +-------+
.
-Normal IPv4 communication->.<----- M4P6E ----->
. communication
.
------- Normal IPv6 communication ----------------->
.


Figure 5


5. Port Number Issue

M4P6E require port number of transport layer. M4P6E can not support
ICMPv4 [RFC0792]. The function provided by ICMPv4 does not work in
M4P6E environments, such as Path MTU Discovery [RFC1191], ping
command, etc.

M4P6E can not also support IPv4 IPsec ESP [RFC4303] because transport
header is encrypted.


6. IANA Considerations

This document makes no request of IANA.

Note to RFC Editor: this section may be removed on publication as an
RFC.




Matsuhira Expires August 7, 2016 [Page 6]

Internet-Draft M4P6E February 2016


7. Security Considerations

M4P6E use automatic tunneling technologies. Security consideration
related tunneling technologies are discussed in RFC2893 [RFC2893],
RFC2267 [RFC2267], etc.


8. References

8.1. Normative References

[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.

8.2. References

[RFC0792] Postel, J., "Internet Control Message Protocol", STD 5,
RFC 792, September 1981.

[RFC1191] Mogul, J. and S. Deering, "Path MTU discovery", RFC 1191,
November 1990.

[RFC1631] Egevang, K. and P. Francis, "The IP Network Address
Translator (NAT)", RFC 1631, May 1994.

[RFC2267] Ferguson, P. and D. Senie, "Network Ingress Filtering:
Defeating Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP Source
Address Spoofing", RFC 2267, January 1998.

[RFC2893] Gilligan, R. and E. Nordmark, "Transition Mechanisms for
IPv6 Hosts and Routers", RFC 2893, August 2000.

[RFC4303] Kent, S., "IP Encapsulating Security Payload (ESP)",
RFC 4303, December 2005.


Author's Address

Naoki Matsuhira
Fujitsu Limited
17-25, Shinkamata 1-chome, Ota-ku
Tokyo, 144-8588
Japan

Phone: +81-3-3730-8386
Fax:
Email: matsuhira@jp.fujitsu.com




Matsuhira Expires August 7, 2016 [Page 7]