Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://www.umo.msu.ru/docs/projects/monitoring/gotov_k_real_fgos_12_12.pdf Дата изменения: Mon Apr 1 19:34:38 2013 Дата индексирования: Thu Feb 27 20:25:29 2014 Кодировка:

www.vovr.ru

1992




.. , .. , .. , . . ..

( )

1. , , « » , , . : (), , , , , , , , , . , ­ 2011 . ­ 2012 ., . : ) ; ) ; ) ; ) ; ) , .
1

, , . , , . , , , , , ­ , , .

.: . 2012. 8/9, 10.


4

· 1 2 , 20 12
, . , . ­ 36% ­ ; . : « , »; 77­89%. , . ( ­ 76 95%). . , 40­43% . (19 9%) , ­ 75%. : , , , 4 12. 63 71% , ,

, . . : 1) 97% , () 100 96%, ­ 92%; 2) 72%, ­ 85%, , , ­ , 70%. ­ 53%; 3) ­ 15%, ­ (47%). , , (, , ), , ­ 44%. , 93% 2010 ., 100% 95% 87% . . , .



. , , , . : (55%); , (56%); (59%); (65%); , (67%). , , . : ; ; . , , . , , , : 59% , , , , (57%) .

5

, . , 2011 .; 77% , , , , . : (86%); () (85%); (82%). : (70%); ( , ) (68%). , : (, , , ) (57%); (, , , ) (53%); (53%). , , : (29%);


6

· 1 2 , 20 12
­ 80% , ­ 36% ) . : , , : 10% 53% . , , , , : 47,2 . 2009/2010 2010/ 2011 « » , 12,8 . ­ , 60 . . , , 200 . , , , ,

, (27%); (26%); (17%); (16%). , . , , , , , . . . ( ), ( , ). , (

1 , , 2011 . (.)
, « », (.) ( ) 3274 2484* 10775 6180** 45934 7109*** 59983 15773 , « », (.) 424 334 166 194 , 132 218 143 148



7 26 277 310

* , ­ . ** «» (1863 .), . .. (1384 .). *** « » (1350 .), (1200 .).



218 , ­ 143 , ­ 132 . « » (. 1). , , , 2011 . , 23 40% . , . . , , « » (15%) « , » (23%). , , ­ 44 56%. , 25% , 40 80% ­ 36 45% ­ . , , , ­ 80%, ­ 70%, 65 76%.

7

, , . ( ) , , . , . , () . , , , . . , ( 30­40% ) ( 40­60% ); (25% ). . , ; , ( 8­10%


8

· 1 2 , 20 12
. « , ()» 40% 61 73% . . ( 31 61%), , , « », ­ . , , . , , , , . 2012 . , : 2% . 80% , ( 43%), , ( ) (), 55% .

). , , , . . , , , ­ 28%. . , , , () ( ), ­ . , , , . , 24%, , 45%(!). , , ­ , « ». , , ,



, , , , . , ( ), ­ , , , , , ( , , , , .), ( , , .). , . , , , . , . . , , , 15, 16 18% . , ; . , 67 81% , ,

9

­ 55 60% . , , ­ , 60% , , 14 7%. , , (8%) , , . (). , , , , , . 2011 . : 100 41% , 50 43% , , , 16% 50%. : 54% 32% . 20% 50%. 100 50 , ­ 95%, 5% 50%. , 100 , ,


10

· 1 2 , 20 12
, . , : 67% , , 23% , 10% . , , , 10% ( ­ 17%) . () . . 2. , , . , . . () ­ , : « (/ )?». , . , 77%

. , 43% 33% 2013 . , 2013 . , 2%, ­ 12%. , . , . ( 90 82% ), , 16%. 2012 . , , , . , 45% ( 37 59%) , 10% , , , . . 15% ­ 5% 22% . : 10­15% , ­ , ,




11

2 2012 .
(% , ) 87 13 90 10





81 19 82 18

81 19 86 14

79 21 88 12

72 28 72 28

91 9 88 12

87 13 85 15

88 12 88 12

84 16 85 15





, 44% . : « » ( ­ 70%), « » ( ­ 50%), « », « ». , ­ . 30% . , , . ­ . ,

. , , . . , , . . , 46% , 17% , ­ 59% 50% ­ , ­ 61% 50% ­ . , , ­ 85% , ­ ­ 40% . ­ , , .


12

· 1 2 , 20 12
. , , , . 90­94% , ­ 87% 82 , ­ 73%. , , , : , 50%. , , , . 13 18% . , , , 2011/2012 , « » . , ­ . . .

, . , 54 63% . , 70%, ­ (41%) (47%). , . . , . , , . 92 96% , (78%) (87%) . , , , . () . , 50% , 13%. 27 31%. . 100% () , , 2010/2011 ,




13

ZYRYANOV V., KOTLOBOVSKY I., SINYAKOV A. UNIVERSITIES PREPAREDNESS TO IMPLEMENT THE FEDER AL STATE: EDUCATIONAL STANDARDS: ORGANI ZATIONAL ASPECT The article continues to present the results of monitoring the implementing effectiveness of the federal state educational standards (FSES) of higher education institutions conducted by the Association of Classical Universities of Russia, the Association of Technical Universities and the Compr ehensive Research Institute o f Educati on MSU at the turn of 2011 ­ the beginning of 2012. The arti cle presents data o n the universi ties organizati onal readiness to implement the FGOS, gives an assessment of the readiness state, identifies «hot spots», which create problems in this way. Also the article draws conclusions aimed at helping universities in setti ng b enchmarks and parameters entering the tempo and rhythm o f the educatio nal activity, regulated by FSES. Key words: federal state educational standard (FSES), monitoring the effectiveness of the FSES implementati on, effectiveness criteria, effectiveness indicator s, or ganiz atio n of the transition to the FSES, regulatory and legal framework, raising the qualification level, logistics and information resources, the quality of educational programs guarantee.

.. , .. , .

:

, . : , , , , , .


, , , ­ , . , , .

, .

«» :
«» . ,