Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.chem.msu.ru/rus/books/2013/science-education-2013/171.pdf
Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Tue May 21 20:20:58 2013
Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Fri Feb 28 15:44:25 2014
Êîäèðîâêà:
­ ?
..
, ,


­

(misconceptions) ­ ( ­ , , ), [1] , [2]. « » [3]. ­ , «», «» « » [4]. , , [5]. . -, ­ [6]. -, (implicit) [7] . , , , , . , - ,


172 , [7]. (mistake) (stereotype), . . , . ( ) . , . , . , . , , , [8]. [9]. «» (« »). , ­ « , » [10]. [11], (, [12, 13]). , ­ . ( ­ ) «» « » . ­ ( , ) [14], . ­ [15, . 343, 423].


173 . , . , , , « » « » , . . , «OH ­ ». , . , , C2H5OH OH­. , . , OH­, ( ­ , OH), . , , , . , , ­ . . , , , [16]. , . , ­ ( , ...) ( , ...). , , (


174 ) [17]. ­ , . , . , ­ ( ) [18], . , [1], , « », , , ­ , . «» - , , , (. 1).

=


=


=



. 1. ,

, , . , , , . . , , [2]. , , ( ), , . , , (


175 -) , [19], [20]. , «-» [21]. «» (. 2).








. 2.

, , . , , . , . , , ( ). , ­ , , . . . ( ­ « », onceptual change), « , » [22]. , « , » [23].


176 , ) ) , . [24, 25], , , , ­ , , .. -: intuitive representations, intuitive rules, spontaneous representations, intuitive knowledge, students conception, children's ideas, alternative frameworks. ( ), . . ( «», natural) . « ­ - [26]. ( «», scholar school-made) (. 3) [2].














. 3.

, ( ) -


177 ( ). (intrinsic). ( ) . , 11% , : «» «» [25]. , , , , 25% . 38% , ( ). [25], ( ). ( ). 1. . 2. ( « »). 3. ( ­ «», ). 4. . , « » , ( ) [27]. 5. , , . 6. . 7. . , , , . , , , , ,


178 , . (, «» ), . , (, « - » « » [28]). , ­ , . , « » , « - » ­ , [28]. , ( ) ­ , , [3]. , ­ , . , . . , (cognitive overload) [29]. , . , . , [30] (. 4),


179 , , .
( )

( )

( )

. 4. ( )

, ( ) . , , ( , ), . . , (congnitive conflict) [31, 32], . , . , . ( ) ( «» «», «» ­ ). (


180 ) , , . : : ­ , ( ). : , , H. : «» ( ). : 00 , H, . : CH3COOH 0 : «» CH3COOH ( ). : 0 . : ( ). : ( ). : H2SO4 HCl 0 : ( ) : (0) ( ) : , : , ( ). : , ( )


181 : 0 : ( ) . ( ) : . ( ), ( ). ( ) . .0 . . : , 0. . ( ). ( ) ( ) ( ), - ( .). , ( ). , . , . , , .


182 , . (. 5).
H HNO3 NO
x

CH3C OOH " "
2

HNO3 NO


x

CH 3C OOH

" "
2

H

H2 " "

. 5. ()

, . , , , « H+ OH­ » [20]. : , (, , ) . (, ) ( , , ) , , . , . , , , , , . ( , ), (, ), ­ , . .


183 , , [33]. , . , , , . , . , , , , . , . , ­ ( ). . , «» , ( « ») , . , . , . , . , ­ , . , ,


184 , . , , , «». ­ , . ­ , , . : ( ) ( ). , , . , . , , , . , . , , ­ . , . 113, 250 , S8. 180, 200 . , 200 . , ­ . . 230, . , .


185 700, , (, , ) . « », . , , . , . , NaCl. , , [34], , , . , . . «--» (Predict ­ Obsereve ­ Explain, ­ POE) [35] , ; , ( ). [36] ( « »), ( ), ­ ( , ), , ­ ( ). [37] 5E- (Engage­Explore­Explain­


186 Elaborate­Evaluation = ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ ) 7E- (Excite/Elicit­Explore­Explain­Expand/Elaborate­Extend­Exchange­ Evaluate = / ­ ­ ­ / ­ ­ ­ ). , (, , ). , , ­ , . (hands-on activity) . , . , , [38]. , , . , ( , , ), , [39]. , (51% 38%) , . , ­ . [40] , 70% , , ­ 51%. , () () ,


187 [41]. ­ , , . , . . , - , , . , POE , , . , , «», «» «» ( , ). , , . , , . [31]. , , , , , . , , , , , . , POE ­ « ­ ­ ­ ­ ­ » [42]. , ( ), , , . . [43, 44], , , .


188 . , (« , ») (« ») (« »). , [45]. , [28], . , , ( ). , , [43]. ( ) [46]. , , , +1 [47]). , . , . , , , , , , . ­ . , , . , , , . ,


189 , . ­ , . . , , . , .
1. Nakhleh M.B. Why Some Students Don't Learn Chemistry Chemical Misconceptions. Journal of Chemical Education, 69, 1992, No 2, p. 191-196. 2. Barke H.-D., Al-Hazari, Yitbarek S. Misconceptions in Chemistry. Addressing Perceptions in Chemical Education. Springer-Verlag, 2009. 3 .. . ... . . , , 1998. 4. Cotu B. Big bubbles in boiling liquids: students' views. Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, 2008, 9, 219­224. 5. diSessa, A. A. (2006). A history of conceptual change research. In K. R. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, pp. 265 ­ 281. 6. Tirosh D., Stavy R., Cohen Sh. (1998) Cognitive conflict and intuitive rules. INT. J. sci. EDUC., 20, 10, 1257-1269. 7. Pozo J.I., Crespo M.A.G. (2005) The Embodied Nature of Implicit Theories: The Consistency of Ideas About the Nature of Matter. COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION, 23(3), 351­387. 8. Collin's Cobuild Advanced Learner English Dictionary. HarperCollinsPublisher, 2003, p. 1419. 9. Longman Dictionary of American English. Longman, 2002, p. 792-793. 10. Lynn D. Newton & Douglas P. Newton (1988): Primary children's conceptions of science and the scientist: is the impact of a National Curriculum breaking down the stereotype?, International Journal of Science Education, 20:9, 1137-1149 11. .. / . .. . 2- ., . . .; , 1996. ­ 367 . 12. Spencer, S.J., Steele, C.M., Quinn, D.M. Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance. // Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Volume 35, Issue 1, p. 428.


190
13. Steele, C.M., Aronson, J. Stereotype Threat and the Intellectual Test Performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Volume 69, Issue 5, November 1995, p. 797-811. 14. Merleau-Ponty M. The Structure of behavior. Duquesne University Press, 1983. 15. .. () . .: , 1973. 16. ãalik, M., Ayas, A. A comparison of level of understanding of eighth-grade students and science student teachers related to selected chemistry concepts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 42 (6), 2005, p. 638-667. 17. .. : . .: , 2010. 18. . . .: , 1983. 19. Schmidt H.-J. Students' Misconceptions ­ Looking for a Pattern. Science Education, 81, 1997, p. 123-135. 20. Horton Ch. Student Alternative Conceptions in Chemistry. California Journal of Science Education, Volume VII, Issue 2 ­ Spring, 2007. www.daisley.net/hellevator/misconceptions/misconceptions.pdf. 21. Kelly R.M., Barrera J.H., Mohamed S.C. An Analysis of Undergraduate General Chemistry Students' Misconceptions of the Submicroscopic Level of Precipitation Reactions. Journal of Chemical Education, 87(1), 2010, p. 113-118. 22. Duit R. & Treagust D.F. (2003): Conceptual change: A powerful framework for improving science teaching and learning, International Journal of Science Education, 25:6, 671-688 23. Pfundt, H. Urspruengliche Erklaerungen der Schueler fu¨ r chemische Vorgaenge. MNU 28 (1975), 157. . [2]. 24. Duit, R. (1999). Conceptual change. Approaches in science education. In: W. Schnotz, S. Vosniadou, & M. Carretero (Eds.), New perspectives on conceptual change (pp. 263­282). Oxford, England: Pergamon. 25. Chiu, M.-H. (2007) A National Survey of Students' Conceptions of Chemistry in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 29 (4) 421-452 26. Hand, B. M. and Treagust, D. F. (1988) Application of a conceptual conflict strategy to enhance student learning of acids and bases Research in Science Education 18: 53 ­ 63. 27. Schmidt H.-J. (1991): A label as a hidden persuader: chemists' neutralization concept. International Journal of Science Education, 13:4, 459-471 28. Tirosh D., Stavy R., Cohen Sh. (1998) Cognitive conflict and intuitive rules. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 10, 1257-1269. 29. Reid N. A scientific approach to the teaching of chemistry. What do we know about how students learn in the sciences, and how can we make our teaching match this to maximize performance? // Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2008, v. 9, p. 51­59. 30. Johnstone A.H. The development of chemistry teaching: A changing response to changing demand. // Journal of Chemical Education, 1993, v. 70, No. 9, p. 701-705. 31. LimÑn, M. On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction. 11 (4-5), 2001, p. 357-380


191
32. Baddock M., Bucat R. (2008). Effectiveness of a Classroom Chemistry Demonstration using the Cognitive Conflict Strategy. International Journal of Science Education, 30, 8, 1115-1128. 33. Geisler, A., Sumfleth, E.: Veraenderung von Schuelervorstellungen im Bereich Saeuren und Basen. In: Brechel, R.: Zur Didaktik der Physik und Chemie. Alsbach 1999 (Leuchtturm). . [2]. 34. Bragg W.H. The recent work on X-rays and crystals and its bearing on chemistry. J. Chem. Soc., Trans., 1916, 109, 252-269. 35. Bee Thao. Literature review: Predict-Observe-Explain procedures. Maggie Broderick, August 3, 2010. 36. ãalik, Muammer (2008) 'Facilitating students' conceptual understanding of boiling using a four-step constructivist teaching method', Research in Science & Technological Education, 26: 1, 59 - 74. 37. ãalik M., Ayas A., Ebenezer J.V.(2009) Analogical reasoning for understanding solution rates: students conceptual change and chemical explanations, Research in Science & Technological Education, 27: 3, 283 -- 308 38. Chambers, S.K., and T. Andre. 1997. Gender, prior knowledge, interest, and experience in electricity and conceptual change text manipulations in learning about direct current. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34, no. 2: 107­23. 39. Zimrot R., Ashkenazi G. Interactive lecture demonstrations: a tool for exploring and enhancing conceptual change. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2007, 8 (2), 197-211. 40. Canpolat N., Pinarbai T., BayrakÃeken S., Geban O. (2006) The conceptual change approach to teaching chemical equilibrium. Research in Science & Technological Education, 24: 2, 217 - 235 41. Teagust D.F., Duit R. Conceptual change: a discussion of theoretical, methodological and practical challenges for science education. Cultural Studies of Science Education (2008) 3:297­328. 42. Cotu B., Ayas A. and Niazc M. Promoting conceptual change in first year students' understanding of evaporation. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2010, 11, 5­16. 43. Finster D.C. (1989). Developmental Instruction. Part I. Perry's Model of Intellectual Development. Journal of Chemical Education, 66, 8, 659-661. 44. Felder R.M., Brent R. (2004) The Intellectual Development of Science and Engineering Students. Journal of Engineering Education, 93 (4), 269­277. 45. Perry W.G. Jr. Patterns in development in Thoughts and Values of Students in a Liberal Art College. A validation of a scheme. Final report. Project No. 5-0825. US Departament of Health, Education and Welfare. April, 1968. 46. Grove N.P., Bretz S.L. Perry's Scheme of Intellectual and Epistemological Development as a framework for describing student difficulties in learning organic chemistry. Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2010, 11, 207­211. 47. Finster D.C. Developmental Instruction Part II. Application of the Perry Model to General Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education, 1991, 68 (9), p. 752-756.