Äîêóìåíò âçÿò èç êýøà ïîèñêîâîé ìàøèíû. Àäðåñ îðèãèíàëüíîãî äîêóìåíòà : http://www.enzyme.chem.msu.ru/ekbio/article/Sergey-2005.pdf
Äàòà èçìåíåíèÿ: Fri Mar 3 09:52:51 2006
Äàòà èíäåêñèðîâàíèÿ: Mon Oct 1 22:29:58 2012
Êîäèðîâêà:
Integrated biological (anaerobic ­ aerobic) and physico-chemical treatment of baker's yeast wastewater
S. Kalyuzhnyi*, M. Gladchenko*, E. Starostina**, S. Shcherbakov** and B. Versprille***
*Department of Chemical Enzymology, Chemistry Faculty, Moscow State University, 119992 Moscow, Russia (E-mail: svk@enz.chem.msu.ru) **Department of Grape Processing Technology, Moscow State University of Food Industry, Volokolamskoye shosse 11, 125080 Moscow, Russia ***Biothane Systems International, Tanthofdreef 21, 2623 EW Delft, The Netherlands (E-mail: bram.versprille@biothane.nl ) Abstract The UASB reactor (35 8C) was quite efficient for removal of bulk COD (52 ­ 74%) from simulated (on the basis of cultivation medium from the first separation process) general effluent of baker's yeast production (the average organic loading rates varied from 8.1 to 16 g COD/l/d). The aerobic-anoxic biofilter (19 ­ 23 8C) can be used for removal of remaining BOD and ammonia from anaerobic effluents; however, it suffered from COD-deficiency to fulfil denitrification requirements. To balance COD/N ratio, some bypass (, 10%) of anaerobically untreated general effluent should be added to the biofilter feed. The application of iron (III)-, aluminium- or calcium-induced coagulation for post-treatment of aerobic-anoxic effluents can fulfil the limits for discharge to sewerage (even for colour mainly exerted by hardly biodegradable melanoidins), however, the required amounts of coagulants were relatively high. Keywords Aerobic-anoxic biofilter; baker's yeast wastewater; iron coagulation; melanoidins; UASB reactor

Water Science & Technology Vol 52 No 10 ­ 11 pp 273­280 Q IWA Publishing 2005

Introduction

Baker's yeast industry represents a substantial threat for environment in Russia due to the large volume of wastewater generated (56 Mm3/year) and its high contamination potential (Kalyuzhnyi et al., 2003). The general effluent from typical Russian yeast factory usually contains 7 ­ 12 g COD/l, 0.5 ­ 11 g/l total N and sulphate as well a significant amount of recalcitrant for biodegradation and highly coloured melanoidin and phenolic substances (Koshel et al., 1992; Kalyuzhnyi et al., 2003). Since land disposal of such contaminated wastewater is banned in Russia, currently many yeast factories are faced with heavy trade-effluent charges because a majority of local municipal sewage treatment plants insist on pre-treatment of such effluents before discharge into their sewerage. The objective of this paper was to develop a lab-scale technology for treatment of simulated (on the basis of cultivation medium from the first separation process, CM-1S) general effluent of baker's yeast factory to meet the limits for discharge of treated wastewater into municipal sewerage. The most troublesome limits in this case are the following (mg/l, except colour): COD ­ 800; SO22 ­ 500; total N ­ 100; N-NH3 ­ 50; P ­ PO32 ­ 3.5; colour 4 4 ­ optical density , 0.1 at dominant wavelength. As a first treatment step, the UASB reactor operating at 35 8C was applied for the elimination of the major part of COD and concomitant sulphate reduction. In a subsequent step, the biofilter operating in alternative aerobic-anoxic regime at , 19 ­ 23 8C was used for the removal of remaining BOD and nitrogen. Finally, coagulation with Fe, Al and Ca was tested to fulfil the limits on COD, total nitrogen, PO32 and colour. 4

273


Materials and methods

Wastewater. A general effluent of yeast factory was simulated by tap water dilution (in 2 ­ 3 times) of CM-1S representing the major (, 30% of total volume wastewater produced) and the strongest stream from such factories (Koshel et al., 1992). Some characteristics of CM-1S taken from Moscow baker's yeast factory during February ­ March, 2003 and used in this study are presented in Table 1.
S. Kalyuzhnyi et al.
274

Laboratory reactors. Details of UASB reactor and aerobic-anoxic biofilter used here are described previously (Gladchenko et al., 2004). The UASB reactor was kept in the thermostat (35 ^ 1 8C) and was seeded with granular sludge (66.5 g VSS, specific aceticlastic activity 2 0.3 g COD/g VSS/day) from the full-scale EGSB reactor treating brewery wastewater (Efes-Moscow). The biofilter operated at 19 ­ 23 8C with attached nitrifying-denitrifying biomass formed during the previous research (Gladchenko et al., 2004) was directly used for treatment of anaerobic effluents in this study. Coagulation assays. They were performed with 200 ml of biofilter effluent in a laboratory glass under continuous stirring and pH control. Addition of coagulant (FeCl3·6H2O, AlCl3 or CaO) was carried out under 200 rpm, then stirring intensity was reduced to 40 rpm to complete a flocculation process during which pH was maintained at 7.2 ­ 7.5 for Fe and Al as well as at 8.0 ­ 8.5 for Ca., The percentage of sludge formed and the sludge volume index (SVI) was determined after 30 min settling. To enhance coagulation, polyelectrolyte Praestol 650 BC (Stockhausen, Germany) was tested at concentrations 5 ­ 78 mg/l Analyses. Sampling of treated wastewater for analysis was usually started after 3 hydraulic retention times (HRT) after change of working regime to ensure reactors operation in quasi steady-state conditions. All analyses were performed by Standard Methods (1995) or as described previously (Gladchenko et al., 2004). Statistical analysis of data was done using Microsoft Excel.
Results and discussion
UASB reactor performance

In the preliminary experiments, it was found that the simulated general effluent was quite biodegradable in anaerobic conditions (. 80% on COD basis). Some results of the mesophilic UASB treatment (35 8C) of this effluent under quasi-steady state operation are shown in Figure 1. It can be seen that a stepwise increase of organic loading rate (OLR) from 8.1 to 16 g COD/l/d led to a decrease of total COD removal from 74 to 52% (Figure 1a). These results are in accordance with literature data on anaerobic treatment of baker's yeast wastewater (Van Der Merwe and Britz, 1993; Van Der Merwe-Botha
Table 1 Range of variation of some characteristics of the CM-1S (average values from 5 samplings are given in brackets)

CODtot, g/l 20.3 ­ 31.1 (25.7) Total N, mg/l 1,075 ­ 1,651 (1,363) Phenolic compounds, mg/l 713 ­ 1,167 (940)

CODSS, g/l 0.95 ­ 2.93 (1.94) N-NH3, mg/l 235 ­ 450 (342) Dominant wavelength, nm 580

CODcol, g/l 0.82 ­ 1.57 (1.20) Total P, mg/l 13 ­ 78 (46) Colour purity, % 48.0 ­ 52.8 (50.4)

CODsol, g/l 18.5 ­ 26.6 (22.6) P-PO4, mg/l 6 ­ 32 (19) Colour luminance, % 46.2 ­ 50.2 (48.2)

pH 4.01 ­ 4.99 (4.50) SO4, mg/l 1,245 ­ 2,267 (1,756) OD580 0.76 ­ 0.88 (0.82)


S. Kalyuzhnyi et al.

Figure 1 Performance of the UASB reactor treating the simulated general effluent of yeast factory: a) influent and effluent total COD and its removal; b) influent and effluent ammonia; c) influent and effluent sulphate and effluent sulphide; d) influent and effluent phosphate and specific methane production

and Britz, 1997; Inanc et al., 1999; Radrigan et al., 2002; Kalyuzhnyi et al., 2003). Only traces of VFA were detected in the effluents (data not shown). However, such exhaustion of easily biodegradable COD in the anaerobic effluents might create COD deficiency problems for subsequent biological nitrogen removal. In spite of acidic influent pH fed, the effluent pH was close to 8 as a result of VFA consumption and mineralisation of nitrogenous species to ammonia (Figure 1b). The specific methane production was around or higher (Figure 1d) the theoretically expected values taking into account the observed COD removal and concomitant sulphate reduction (Figure 1c). The observed higher methane production can be attributed to the presence of betaine in the influents, which is not measured in the COD analysis (Radrigan et al., 2002). The concentrations of phosphate increased (except OLR of 16 g COD/l/d) in the effluents (Figure 1d) due to mineralisation of phosphoric species. On the contrary, a development of biological sulphate reduction led to an almost complete disappearance of sulphate in the UASB reactor (Figure 1c). The latter is almost quantitatively recovered as soluble sulphide (Figure 1c). The observed sulphide concentrations seem to be non-inhibitory for anaerobic sludge, which was a concern for some other studies (Lo and Liao, 1990; Lo et al., 1990). The concentration of phenolic compounds and colour almost did not change (data not shown) showing that phenols and substances responsible for colour are persistent in anaerobic conditions.
Performance of alternative aerobic-anoxic biofilter

During direct treatment of UASB effluents in biofilter (after optimisation of durations of aerobic and anoxic phases which were 25 and 35 min, respectively), the following results were obtained (Figure 2, run 1). It is seen that the average total COD and ammonia removals accounted for 68% and 94%, respectively. However, the effluent nitrate concentrations were relatively high (207 mg N/l, on average) that was related with COD deficiency to have a stable denitrification ­ some part of incoming COD (, 1.15 g/l, Table 4, run 1) was non-biodegradable in neither aerobic nor anoxic conditions.

275


276

S. Kalyuzhnyi et al.
Figure 2 Performance of the aerobic-anoxic biofilter treating the UASB effluents (during runs 2 ­ 3, 10% of anaerobically untreated wastewater was added to the feed to balance COD/N ratio for denitrification): a) influent and effluent total COD and its removal; b) influent and effluent nitrogen species; c) effluent sulphate and phosphate; d) influent and effluent OD580 and its removal

To balance COD/N ratio, 10% of anaerobically untreated general effluent was added to the biofilter feed during runs 2 ­ 3 (durations of aerobic and anoxic phases were 35 ­ 40 and 25 ­ 20 min, respectively). This led to a substantial decrease of nitrate but some increase of ammonia in aerobic effluents (Figure 2b, runs 2 ­ 3). It seems that it is hardly possible to reach a lower level of ammonia in the effluent due to an immanent drawback of this relatively simple biofilter construction where wastewater filling and effluent withdrawal were performed simultaneously in a CSTR regime. The better performance can be expected under disruption of filling and withdrawal phases in the biofilter as in sequencing batch biofilm reactor (SBBR) constructions. Though during runs 2 ­ 3 the total inorganic nitrogen concentrations were around 70 mg N/l, the aerobic effluents also contained significant concentrations (52 ­ 65 mg N/l) of organic nitrogen (seems to be hardly biodegradable) resulting in total nitrogen concentrations above 120 mg N/l (Figure 2b), i.e., higher than discharge limit to sewerage (100 mg N/l). The total COD concentrations during runs 2 ­ 3 were close to the biodegradability limit of the baker's yeast wastewater but higher (Figure 2a) than the discharge limit to sewerage (800 mg/l). Sulphate and phosphate concentrations in the biofilter effluents (Figure 2c) were below or close to the discharge limits 2 500 mg/l and 3.5 mg P/l, respectively. In spite of 63% removal of phenolic compounds during aerobic-anoxic stage (data not shown), colour removal accounted for only 8 ­ 23% (Figure 2d). This is in accordance with our own (Gladchenko et al., 2004) and literature data (Francisca Kalavathi et al., 2001) that the visible colour is mainly associated with the other substances than phenolic compounds namely, with persistent to biodegradation melanoidins.
Performance of iron coagulation step

Preliminary study (Gladchenko et al., 2004) on the application of iron coagulation for posttreatment of biofilter effluents showed that all targeted parameters (total COD and nitrogen, phosphate, ammonia and colour) decreased with increasing acting Fe concentrations


and the discharge limits are already achievable under iron concentrations around 200 mg/l. In order to further optimise an iron coagulation step, an influence of polyelectrolyte (PE) addition was researched (Figure 3). It is seen that the addition of PE has a positive influence on total COD and especially on colour removals (Figure 3a) as well as on quality of sludge formed (Figure 3b). Taking into account a relatively high cost of PE, further experiments were carried out with PE concentration of 10 mg/l. From Table 2, it is seen that though all discharge limits can be ultimately met only under iron concentration of 275 mg/l, reasonable results (only total COD exceeds a discharge limit (800 mg/l)) were already observed under Fe concentration of 193 mg/l (× 10 mg/l PE) (Table 2). The sludge formed under these conditions was reasonably voluminous (SVI ¼ 418 ml/g TSS) and had 49% of VSS content (Table 2). Further increase of Fe added led to a decrease of VSS content of sludge and to a decrease of residual iron in treated water (Table 2). Since there is a discharge limit for Fe (3 mg/l) in Russia, which is difficult to meet, the coagulation step was further researched with Al and Ca limits for which are much less strict.
Performance of aluminium coagulation step

S. Kalyuzhnyi et al.

From Tables 3 ­ 4, it is seen that the PE addition had a slight influence on performance of Al coagulation. All the discharge limits can be ultimately met under Al concentration of around 540 mg/l (Tables 3 ­ 4) though the reasonable results (only total COD slightly exceeds a discharge limit) were already observed under Al concentration of 372 mg/l (× 10 mg/l PE) especially on colour removal and the SVI of sludge formed (Table 4). Moreover, half of the colour was removed even at Al concentration of 193 mg/l (× 10 mg/l PE) (Table 4). However, the sludge volume is too large (Tables 3 ­ 4) and this might create problems for its dewatering and disposal.
Performance of calcium coagulation step

The PE addition also did not have a significant influence on performance of Ca coagulation (Tables 5 ­ 6). Though Ca was not able to fulfil a COD limit (800 mg/l) even at its highest concentration applied, this coagulant was quite efficient for colour removal and the formed sludges had low SVIs (Tables 5 ­ 6). Taking into account a low cost of CaO, this may also be an option for post-treatment of anaerobic-anoxic effluents. Comparative coagulation studies with Fe, Al and Ca showed that the latter coagulant may be considered as an option for post-treatment of aerobic-anoxic effluents taking into account non-strict limits for this ion (compared to Fe) for discharge into sewerage and relatively low volume of sludge generated (compared to Al). However, generally coagulation seems to be an expensive step taking into account expenses for chemicals and sludge disposal. Thus, there is a need for development of cheaper alternatives for

Figure 3 Influence of polyeletrolyte addition on performance of iron coagulation step (98 mg/l Fe): a) total COD and colour decrease; b) sludge percentage and SVI

277


Table 2 Performance of iron coagulation step with addition of 10 mg/l PE
Parameters 0 98 Acting Fe concentration, mg/l 193 275 375 465

CODtot, mg/l Phenols, mg/l P-PO4, mg/l Ntot, mg/l N-NH3, mg/l N-NO3, mg/l Norg, mg/l Residual Fetot, mg/l OD580 Dominant wavelength, nm Purity, % Luminance, % Sludge percentage, % vol. SVI, ml/g TSS Sludge VSS/TSS, %

1,810 122 1.79 121.1 61.3 8.0 51.9 0 0.219 578 29.4 76.1 ­ ­ ­

1,390 87 0.04 99.5 54.8 6.9 33.2 51.6 0.184 580 25.3 77.3 45.0 777 48.6

1,050 68 Traces 75.0 49.5 6.5 19.0 20.9 0.108 578 19.1 86.2 46.4 418 46.3

800 60 Traces 66.1 49.0 6.2 10.9 11.0 0.074 577 16.5 89.5 49.6 316 41.6

710 53 Traces 58.2 45.0 6.0 7.2 5.5 0.07 577 15.9 90.0 51.6 285 37.4

630 47 Traces 54.7 42.1 5.8 6.8 4.7 0.066 577 15.3 90.5 54.5 260 32.9

278

S. Kalyuzhnyi et al.

Table 3 Performance of aluminium coagulation step without addition of PE
Parameters 0 195 Acting Al concentration, mg/l 375 545 702 850

CODtot, mg/l Phenols, mg/l P-PO4, mg/l Ntot, mg/l N-NH3, mg/l N-NO3, mg/l Norg, mg/l OD580 Dominant wavelength, nm Purity, % Luminance, % Sludge percentage, % vol. SVI, ml/g TSS Sludge VSS/TSS, %

1,810 122 1.79 121.1 61.3 8.0 51.9 0.219 578 29.4 76.1 ­ ­ ­

1,040 79 0.14 89.6 60.8 7.4 21.4 0.138 577 19.7 83.8 90.7 501 51.2

900 67 Traces 78.1 58.6 7.0 12.5 0.122 575 15.3 86.4 92.1 342 54.0

780 55 Traces 69.9 56.3 6.8 6.8 0.078 575 15.9 86.1 93.5 220 47.1

760 53 Traces 63.2 52.9 6.4 3.9 0.062 577 13.5 92.5 94 179 38.4

720 49 Traces 61.2 52.1 6.0 3.1 0.052 578 14.1 91.5 93.9 169 51.9

Table 4 Performance of aluminium coagulation step with addition of 10 mg/l PE
Parameters 0 193 Acting Al concentration, mg/l 372 540 697 845

CODtot, mg/l Phenols, mg/l P-PO4, mg/l Ntot, mg/l N-NH3, mg/l N-NO3, mg/l Norg, mg/l OD580 Dominant wavelength, nm Purity, % Luminance, % Sludge percentage, % vol. SVI, ml/g TSS Sludge VSS/TSS, %

1,810 122 1.79 121.1 61.3 8.0 51.9 0.219 578 29.4 76.1 ­ ­ ­

1,000 71 Traces 88.0 59.5 7.3 21.2 0.112 578 20 85.5 93.8 509 40.0

830 56 Traces 75.5 49.5 7.0 19.5 0.070 577 14.7 90.7 93.7 322 78.9

760 49 Traces 65.8 48.4 6.8 10.6 0.062 577 14.4 91.2 93.5 228 42.3

720 48 Traces 62.1 47.1 6.4 8.6 0.061 577 14.4 91.2 93.4 176 35.3

700 45 Traces 59.6 45.5 6.0 8.1 0.056 577 13.5 92.1 93.6 155 39.9


Table 5 Performance of calcium coagulation step without addition of PE
Parameters 0 1463 Acting Ca concentration, mg/l 1790 2102 2689

CODtot, mg/l Phenols, mg/l P-PO4, mg/l Ntot, mg/l N-NH3, mg/l N-NO3, mg/l Norg, mg/l OD580 Dominant wavelength, nm Purity, % Luminance, % Sludge percentage, % vol. SVI, ml/g TSS Sludge VSS/TSS, %

1,810 122 1.79 121.1 61.3 8.0 51.9 0.219 578 29.4 76.1 ­ ­ ­

1,620 58 Traces 90.2 56.5 7.5 26.2 0.062 575 15.3 91.1 98.8 402 54.6

1,490 49 Traces 61.1 52.2 6.9 2.2 0.052 575 15.0 91.9 32.2 118 38.9

1,390 49 Traces 59.0 49.4 6.5 3.1 0.05 575 13.5 92.5 36.4 116 29.2

1,150 47 Traces 54.8 47.8 6.0 1.0 0.046 575 11.2 93.8 37.0 118 13.0

S. Kalyuzhnyi et al.

Table 6 Performance of calcium coagulation step with addition of 10 mg/l PE
Parameters 0 1451 Acting Ca concentration, mg/l 1776 2083 2667

CODtot, mg/l Phenols, mg/l P-PO4, mg/l Ntot, mg/l N-NH3, mg/l N-NO3, mg/l Norg, mg/l OD580 Dominant wavelength, nm Purity, % Luminance, % Sludge percentage, % vol. SVI, ml/g TSS Sludge VSS/TSS, %
p

1,810 122 1.79 121.1 61.3 8.0 51.9 0.219 578 29.4 76.1 ­ ­ ­

1,600 58 Traces 87.9 54.2 7.4 26.3 0.054 575 14.1 92.0 98.0 388 47.0

1,400 48 Traces 60.2 51.4 6.9 2.9 0.048 575 13.2 92.8 29.1 109 36.9

1,300 45 Traces 56.5 47.7 6.5 2.3 0.046 575 13.2 92.9 34.7 112 27.3

1,090 45 Traces 52.7 44.7 6.0 2.0 0.042 573 10.0 94.4 35.3 115 8.0

after 30 min of settling

decolourisation and organic nitrogen removal of aerobic-anoxic effluents, e.g., application of cyanobacteria, which are able to degrade melanoidins (Francisca Kalavathi et al., 2001).

Conclusions

The UASB reactor was quite efficient for removal of bulk COD (52 ­ 74%) from simulated general effluent of baker's yeast production. The aerobic-anoxic biofilter can be used for removal of remaining BOD and ammonia from anaerobic effluents; however, it suffered from COD-deficiency to fulfil denitrification requirements. To balance COD/N ratio, some bypass of raw wastewater should be added to the biofilter feed. The application of coagulation for post-treatment of aerobic-anoxic effluents can fulfil the discharge limits to the sewer (even for colour exerted by hardly biodegradable melanoidins); however, the required amount of inorganic coagulants were relatively high.

279


Acknowledgements

The financial support of Biothane Systems International is gratefully acknowledged. The authors also wish to thank Moscow baker's yeast factory for delivering the CM-1S.

References
Francisca Kalavathi, D., Uma, L. and Subramanian, G. (2001). Degradation and metabolization of the pigment-melanoidin in distillery effluent by the marine cyanobacterium Oscillatoria boryana bdu 92. Enzyme Microb. Technol., 29, 246 ­ 251. Gladchenko, M., Starostina, E., Shcherbakov, S., Versprille, B. and Kalyuzhnyi, S. (2004). Combined biological and physico-chemical treatment of baker's yeast wastewater including removal of coloured and recalcitrant to biodegradation pollutants. Wat. Sci. Technol., 50, (5) 67 ­ 72. Inanc, B., Ciner, F. and Ozturk, I. (1999). Color removal from fermentation industry effluents. Wat. Sci. Technol., 40(1), 331 ­ 338. Kalyuzhnyi, S.V., Gladchenko, M.A., Starostina, Ye.A, Shcherbakov, S.S. and Korthout, D. (2003). High-rate anaerobic treatment as a key step of purification of baker's yeast wastewater. Manufacture of alcohol and liqueur and vodka products., N3, 20 ­ 23. Koshel, M.I., Shmatko, T.I, Karanov, Yu.A., Zabolotnaya, G.M. and Gasyuk, S.V. (1992). Purification of wastewater from factories producing baker's yeasts. In: Alcohol, yeast, liqueur and vodka industry, Ser. 24, v.3, Moscow, AgroNIITEIPP. Lo, K.V. and Liao, P.H. (1990). Anaerobic treatment of baker's yeast wastewater: I. Start-up and sodium molybdate addition. Biomass., 21, 207 ­ 218. Lo, K.V., Chen, A. and Liao, P.H. (1990). Anaerobic treatment of baker's yeast wastewater: II. Sulfate removal. Biomass., 23, 25 ­ 37. Radrigan P., Versprille A.I. and Korthout H.P (2002). High rate anaerobic treatment for bakery yeast wastewater in Chile. Proc. of poster presentations of the 7th Latin American Workshop and Symp. on Anaerobic Digestion (22 ­ 25 October 2002, Merida, Mexico), p. 353 ­ 356. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (1995). 19th edn, American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington DC, USA. Van Der Merwe, M. and Britz, T.J. (1993). Anaerobic digestion of baker's yeast factory effluent using an anaerobic filter and a hybrid digester. Biores. Technol., 43, 169 ­ 174. Van Der Merwe-Botha, M. and Britz, T.J. (1997). Combined pre-degradation and anaerobic digestion for the treatment of a baker's yeast factory effluent. Wat. Sci. Technol., 36(6 ­ 7), 295 ­ 301.

280

S. Kalyuzhnyi et al.