Документ взят из кэша поисковой машины. Адрес оригинального документа : http://www.philol.msu.ru/~rlc2010/abstracts/rlc2010_abstracts_sec09.pdf
Дата изменения: Thu Oct 21 01:14:05 2010
Дата индексирования: Tue Oct 2 17:21:03 2012
Кодировка:

IX.

. .
. . . (, ) adskova.tp@bk.ru , , ,

Summary. In the paper is given substantiation of word-formative criteria during ascertainment of real limits between a) nous of adjectival declination and b) substantivates, paper is defining status of a) and b) in word-formative nests' structure. () - . . , , . , ( . . ) -- , . -- , . , , . -- . . . , . . , -- , . , , . , : , : -- . -- , . 360 , , , . , . . . , , . 0,2% « » . . . 3,9. . -, - . -- 4 . (50%). 20 30%. (52%), -- 35%. -- (65% ). : - . : , . -- , , . . - : ) ; ) ; ) , ( ) -- . , 2- 3- . « » . , : - , - , - . , .

IX.

. .
araeva@list.ru , , , ,

Summary. The paper suggests the application of the method of systemological language analysis introduced into linguisitcs by G. P. Mel'nikov for research on such mental and language model as word-formational type. , , (). , . , , . , ( , . . ), . , . , , . . : « ?» , ( ; , : ). , , . -() « -- -- » (, , , , , .). , , , . , . , : « -- -- », « -- -- ». , , . , , (.: , -- « , ), . , , , - , , . , . -- , , ; , , ( ). - , , - , , . . , -- . - , , , . , - , . , , , , . : -- -- « , »; -- «, »; -- « , »; -- « , ». , ( ) , , , - , , - , . ( -, , , , ) , , .

. .
(--) aleXbo@mail.ru , , -,

Summary. The paper deals with modification and mutation as the two different guishing features are revealed through analysis of mutative meanings of prefix meanings are proved to be related with the earlier locative meanings of this prefix genesis of a new pattern took place as the denotative situation moved out of the p nates of social activity. .

models of verbal prefixation in Russian. Their distinpro- (loss, misfortune for a subject of action). These (moving forward, through, passing by). The historical hysical dimensions of objects to the pragmatic coordi-

, (. . , . . 361

IX.

. . , . . , . . ). . , : . , : -- . , , « » [4: 114] (. [2]). , : , , , - [1]. ? - ( -...-) : (), (, ), (). - . , . , . - *per - ` ' [3: 355]; [5: 338]. `', `', `', `' [8: 68]. , . ( ). , ( . . ). , , : , . - (, ). . , , , , ? , (. . . , . . ), : , . . . . (.), 293. XVI . ~ XIV . [6: 126]. . : : -- , -- ` , '. - . XIXVII . -

: : . . ., 1527, . 1. 1643 . [6: 192]; . . ., 152. XV . [6: 284]; . . ., 65. XIXII . [6: 161], . XII, 368. 1691 . [6: 160]. . , , . : , [7: 525], && [7: 522]. , . , - , «» . -- , , .

,

, , , : , -- , . , , ( . . , -- , -- , -- ). , . . . , (, ) -. `', `' - . . `, , '.

1. . . // vdahl.agava.ru. 2. . . ( ). , 1999. 3. . . ., 2001. 4. . . , . ., 2000. 5. . . . ., 1974. 6. XIXVII . . 20. ., 1991. 7. ( XXI ) / . . . , . . . 2- ., . ., 1999. 8. . . - : 2 . 45 ., . . 2. ., 2001.

. .
. - (, ) buzelo70@mail.ru , , ,

Summary. Tendencies of development of morphemic valency connections are conditioned by evolution of morphemes' meanings, appearance of new affixes and stems, and expressiveness of current social and politic discourse. 362 . , -

IX.

, , , . : , -- . , , ( , ) - . , -, -, - , (1952) (1970) , (1980), (1989) . - -- ` , -': , , . -- , , , . . , . . . - ( . gate). , - , , , « » : , , . , , ( -- , ). : , , . , , , , -- -- / - . , , , , , .

, , : , , . , . , , : , , , , . -j, - ` '. «» (, , ), , , , , , , . , . . , -- , . , , , , -, ; -, ( ), ; -, , , , . , , , , , .

1. . . : . . ., 2003. 2. . . . -. ., 1994. 3. / . . . , . . . ., 1989.

X I X .
. .
k-filolog-osl@stavsu.ru C 1 ., ,

Summary. This paper is devoted to the research of semantic, pragmatic characteristics motivated Russian personal names in the language of the XIX-th century. , XIX ., . , . , , , . , , , « , , ». , . [4]: -- , ; [3]: -- , ; [2]: -- , , , -- , , ; [1]: -- ; [4]: -- , . , , , XIX . , . , , : -- , . , , 363

IX.

, : -- , . , , . -- , , -- [3], -- , , , , -- , [2]. , XIX ., : -- , , , . , XIX . : -- , , -- , , [3]; -- , [1]. , , , . , . , : -- , [4], [3], -- , -- , [2], [3]. : -- , , -- [3], -- , [4]. (, ), (). , XIX ., : -- , , , ( ). , : -- , [2], -- , [5]. «» ( ) -- .

«» , , -. XIX . - . - , XIX . , , «», , XIX . , . -- [2], [3] -- : , ( , ). , , : «, , - (, , )». , , , , . , , : -- , . , , «» «». : (), (), (). , , . , , . , , , , , : -- , , -- [2].

1. . , , . . 12. ., 18431844. 2. . -- . . 12. , 1834. 3. - . . 14. ., 1847. 4. . . . 13. ., 18631864. 5. . . , . . 13. ., 18031806.

( )
. .
« » elvdenisova@yandex.ru , , ,

Summary. In the report are opened the questions connected to the description of individual language systems in mass media. The special attention is given to active processes of formation of new words, occurring in language of advertisement. , , . , . , . , -364 . , / . , . -- «» , , , .

IX.

, , . , ( ), , , , , (). -- -- : 1. (1) (2), .: (1) ) (); ) (, D); (2) ) (0 { + }; { + }); ) (ORANGE {orange + }); ) (T { + }) . / , . , , . 2. , -, (.: { + }; GREEN { + green}; { + }). -, , , , (.: { + }; GREENi {green + }; { + }; { + } .). 3. . , , ({-} -), , ({} ). -- , ({ } ). 4. « », , .: , GREEN, , . Tuborg -- GREENi ; GREENi!.

5. , ( / ) (.: '; ^; @; %; IIIIII; @; ; .). , -- , , . «» . , , . 6. , , , . / ( ), (.: , ). 7. , , . , { (. «») + } (c. ). , . , «» , , ( ) / . , , . , , -- . -- , , - , . -- -- .

*
. .
. . oidmitrieva55@yandex.ru , - ,

Summary. One of current problems of modern Russian philology is a dynamic study of semantic-word-formative subsystems of the Russian language, e. g. subsystems of prefixal verbs, formed from verbs. Synchronous-diachronic analysis of such subsystems allows to understand the mechanism of the Russian word formation and to reveal the moving forces and trends of. , , , , , , , . , . -

___________________________________ * « - », ( 090400193).

365

IX.

, , . -- -- . -- -- . , , . . - . - , ([9]; [8]; [1]; [6]; [7]; [2]; [3]; [5] .). - , . - , , . - , , . : , , . , , (, [2] [7]), - ,

-, - ( - , - , , ). - , , -- () , . - . , , [2], . - - , , . .

1. . . . ., 1984. 2. . . . , 2005. 3. . . : -uj- (-j) . , 2007. 4. . . : // . ., 1994. 5. . . : . , 2007. 6. . . : , . ., 1998. 7. . . . , 2000. 8. . . : . , 1987. 9. . . // . ., 1994.

:
. .
. . () zhajdo@list.ru , , ,

Summary. The report is devoted to the historiographical overview of motivology -- the science which studies the lexical phenomenon of motivation from the point of view of language speakers. The founder of the motivological concept is Professor of Tomsk State University -- Blinova O. I. who is turning 80 in 2010. 80- . . . 60- -- 70- . XX . , , , . -- , « », « » (), « » (. . ) , , , , . 366 . I : 70- -- 80- . XX . 1972 . . . « », , , . « » (., 1972). . 92104. . 1974 . . . « », -- ,

IX.

( , , .), , (, .). , , « : » (, 19821983), . , 30 ( ). 20000 , . : , , (, .). -- -, , , , , . . « : » (1984). II : 80- -- 90- . XX . . . , . , , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . . , . , , . -

, , , . , , , , - ; -- , . . III : 90- . XX . -- XXI . , , . , 19921996 ., -- . 1996 . -- , , , : . . (), : . . , : . . (), : . . (). , , , . , : . . , . . (), . . , - : . . . : . . , : . . , : . . . . , « : », , . 30 . . « » ( 2007), « » 3- ( 2000, 2002, 2005), ( 2 0 0 0 ).

. . , . .
, . akaz76@mail.ru, serenus@yandex.ru , , , ,

Summary. In the given report word-formation differences of borrowing words are considered and character of interaction of borrowing words with its derivatives is established in modern Russian language. 0. « » , , . 1. , . ( ), -- ( ). . () , / . «» «» , , ( , , , , . .). -- : , , . , , , , . , , . . 2. 367

IX.

( ) . , : ( ) ( ). . / / (.: , -- , -- , -- -- , -- ). , . , . ( ) ( ). . / , , , . , ( -- , -- ), ( -- , , , ), (, , , ), (, , , , , ). 3. , , ( -- ). (, , ). ( -

), . , , . : (-), -(j-), -(j-), -j- [2]. , , -. . , , , .: 1 (. Archiv -- `1. , ; 2. , ; 3. , . ., -. , ' [1: 81]) -- , , , , , , - [2, . 1: 75] 2 (. archive -- ` ') -- , , , , , [3: 8889]. , -- ( -- , -- , -- ) ( -- , -- , -- ), . [3]. , . 4. , . , , , , .

1. . . . 4- ., . ., 2002. 2. . . : 2 . ., 1985. 3. XXI . / . . . . ., 2008.

. . , . .
« » katpa@rambler.ru , , / ,

Summary. The report is devoted to research of the derivative polymotivation as the sort of natural semantization. It is shown experimentally that the polymotivation is caused by the structural-semeiotic properties of derivative, such as it's agglutination / fusion and degree of morphemes' articulation. 1. -- - . (. . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . ), (. . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . ), . « ... ... » [1: 88], 368 , -- , / / () ( ) . 2. , , . , : () «» (. . ) / »-

IX.

» (. . ) ; () , , , , ; () - / ; () - ; () - . 3. - -- / . -- 21 . (6- ) 45 81 -- , , , , , . 126 558 ( ), . 3.1. 46 118 - , 20 117 - , 11 110 , 9 102 - , 1 111 - . , . 3.2. , . , , , , . 3.2.1. ,

- -- (, ; , , ). - , -- -() , , . 3.2.2. , . , , , < , < , - . 3.2.3. , / . , - . , -, . 4. / , . , , , , , -- , , .

1. . . . ., 2002.

:
. .
ir_kov@yahoo.com , ,,,

Summary. The report is devoted to the description of the criterions characteristic of holophrastic constructions from the point of modern neological investigations. Holophrastic constructions, as neologisms, are charecterised according the following criterions: chronological, local, psycholinguistic, social, lexicographical. -- , . , « ». -- . , -- , . - , I . . ; . , (, ). (, ---). «» : ( ); ( ); , , ; ( ); ; , , . , , , , , ( , ), . 369

IX.

, « », ( ), : , . : , , , , . . 1. . () ( -- ) . , ... ----? (. , . ). ------ ... (, 1974). 2. . , , , , ( ). , : ---- , (. , ), « ------- (. , ). 3. , ( , , ): ? -

, , ; , (. ). 4. , , , : ... «!» (. , . ), , » (. ). 5. , ( « . »).

1. . . // « », , , 1989. . 3234. 2. . . . . ... . . . , 2007. . 914. 3. . . // . . : : 3 . . 2. . , 2003. . 1 5 5 1 7 8 . 4. . . : . . ... . . . , 1984. 5. . . ( -- I ): . . ... . . . . , 2007. 6. . . . , 1980. 7. . . . ., 2005. 8. . . // . 1977. 3. . 916.

. .
kozinec74@mail.ru , ,

Summary. The main topic of the report is to overlook different ways of word-producing metaphor making literal and stylistic peculiarities of the approach. () -- , , : ` , ' -- ` - ( )', ` ' -- ` , '. , , . : , , (, , ). , ( ) -- , - . : -- `, () ', ` ', ` ', ` ( )', ` ', ` ' .: [] ! , , , (. , ); , , , (. , ). 370 : 1) ) : . , , (. , ) ) : , 24 1917 , , (. , ); 2) , : , (. , ). : « ,," ». (, 2006, 32). : (. , ); 3) : , , (. , , ). () -

IX.

, , , : - ... , . (. , ) : , (. , ). , , , ,

, , -- ` ', -- ` '. , (, , ), , : (), (), (, ) .

. .
. . () krylova.tasha@mail.ru , , , ,

Summary. The computer slang as professional slang area replenishes at the expense of use of known word-formation models and wordformation means. Such ways of word-formation of computer slang, as semantic tightening, abbreviation, suffixation, and also a semantic derivation appear the most productive. , , , , , . , . : , , () [1: 119]. : ( ), ( ), ( , ), ( ), ( ). , , . . , , , , « ». , , , . , « + ». + -- (--): < ; < ; < . : ( < , < , < , < «» -- ); (Net < Internet; < notebook); ( < , , < ); ( < -- ; < system administrator -- ); - ( < Also Known As -- ...); IMHO < in my humble opinion -- ... , ; : PnP < Plug and Play -- («Plug and Pray» -- ); , . . , , , : 2L8 < Too Late -- ..., BBL8R < Be Back Later -- ..., W8 < Wait -- ... F2F < Face to face -- . , 8 4, ['eit] [fo:] w[], l[]r, b[] . . , : CU < See you -- , ..., CUL < See you later -- ..., U = You -- . , , . , -()-. -()- : < -- -- , < -- , , < -- , . . , , , , , . (, - .) . : (), (), (), ( , ). , . . : -- ( ); -- ; , -- . , , «», «»: , -- ( , ?); -- (- , , ?..). «» , , , . , : (. upgrade < up -- + grade -- ) -- -, ( ). , , . , , - , : an't n Invalid Request. 371

IX.

, . : System halted. , , . , ,

. , , , .

1. . . . ., 2 0 0 1 .

. .
. . . vpks@rambler.ru ,

Summary. The report deals with the steady tendencies in historical development of the Russian word-building, defining the specific features of the Russian word-formation system. , : (., . -- --, . . - -, -- --, - - .); , - ; ; , , - . , . : 1. . , . . , , . . : , , ., . [1]. 2. - . ( ), , , , - . ( , , ) . - , , , . ___________________________________ * , 090400193.

, - , , ; ., . [2]. 3. . - , , . - . , , , . 4. . , -- , . : , , , - . , , , , . , , , -- . , .

1. . . // . . 2 0 0 2 . 6 . . 5 9 6 9 . 2. . . - // . , 2005. . 3944.

372

IX.

.-. (Karl-Henrik Lund)
. . mail@khlund.dk , ,

Summary. Different types of hyphenated noun co-ordinates are characterized formally and semantically. Special emphasis is made on the formation and use of new co-ordinate compounds where both components decline. It is claimed that the two components of such newly formed compound words as a rule engage in a hypotactic semantic relation determined by contextual and semantic-pragmatic factors. , , , , . . -, -, , -, -, -. , , . , . , , , . , , : -. , [1; 2; 4; 5]. , , -, -, -, -, -, -, -, -. [4] , [5], . [1: 245 .] , , (., -, -, -), , (., -). , . -, , « » (., - . exit poll), -, , (., -, - . contact centre, keycard), (., - . business process), -, , (., -, -), , , , , (., -, -). . , , : . , -, -, , , -- . , , , . - -. , , . -, ... ( ) -... ( ). . . , . . , . [3], , , . , , , -- [6] -- « » , . . , ( ) . . , (http://www.ruscorpora.ru), , .

1. . . . . . 2- ., . . ., 2001. 2. . . // / . . . . 3- ., . . ., 1999. . 286 441. 3. . ., . ., . . // (http:// www.philol.msu.ru/~humlang/articles/novgazlex.html. 4. . . . . ., 2005. 5. . . . 2- ., . ., 2005. 6. Belentschikow R. Benennungsweisen // Russisch im Spiegel des Deutschen. Eine EinfЭhrung in den russisch-deutschen und deutschrussischen Sprachvergleich / Hrsg. Wolfgang Gladrow. Frankfurt am M ai n , 1 9 9 8 . . 2 0 9 2 4 2 .

373

IX.

. -
() jmb@ps.pl , ,

Summary. In the World of Symilativums. In Russian one finds a considerable group of so-called similativums -- suffixal derivatives and compounds. It comprises nouns referring to objects as based on their similarity to other objects. The same mechanism lies at the basis of metaphor. . . . , . . . , . , , `() ', el burro (. `') . [1]; [2]. , , . 2 : . -(), - (-), -(): (@), (^), . ` ', , ` ', , ` ', ` ', ` , - - ', ` , , ' . , -(), - . -- . .: -() (.) -() (.), -() (.) -() ` ' (.), - (.) - , ; (.) [3]. , : . : ` , ', `, ', ` ', - ` -- '. , , (). : -, -, -, -, -; -, -, -, -, -. , : 1) : ; 2) : -, -, -, - `, ', , -; 3) : -, -, -, -, -, -; 4) : , -, ` ', -, -, -; 5) : -, -, -. , , . . tertium comparationis, , .: , - ( ), `, ', -() `' (), ` ', - (), , - (), - ` , ( )' (), `', - ` , ; ' ().

1. . : / . . . Pozna, 1998. . 1116. 2. JСwiak J. , Pozna, 2007. 3. Miturska-Bojanowska J. O metaforze i sufiksie podobiestwa w dydaktyce // Annales Neophilologiarum. 2004. 2. Szczecin, 2005. S. 147152.

. .
osilbekova@list.ru , ,

Summary. The paper considers derivative archetype as a group of word-formative types with common formant. We examine two kinds of substantive's archetypes -- homogeneous and heterogeneous. « » , () . , . , , . (). , , . 374 . , : -: , , ( .); , ( .); -: , , ( .); ( .); -: ( .); ( .); -: , ( ); , ( ); -(): ( .); ( .); ( .); -: , , ( .); ( .);

IX.

-: , , ( ); , , ( .); -(): , , ( ); ( .); , ( .); -: ( .); ( .). : -(): , , ( .); , , ( .); `': -: ( .), , ( .); -: , ( .); , , ( .). . , . . , , : -: ( .) -- ; , , ( .) -- ; -(): ( .); ( .) -- ; , , ( .) -- ; -(): ( .) -- ; ( .) -- . - . . , , `', `', `', ` '. . `', `', `' : -(), -, -(), -,

-, -, -, -, -, -(), -, -(), -(), -(), -(), -(), - / -. , - , `' (, ), `' (, ), `' (, ). `' `' -, -, -(), -(), -, -(). , - -- (, ) (, ) . , . , , : `', `': - (, ), - (, ); `', `', : -() (, , ); `', `', : -() (, , ), -() (, , ); `', `', `', : () (, , , ); - (, , , ); `', : -j() / -j() (, ), - (, ). , -- -(), `' () `' (, ). , , . , -- .

X X X X I .

. . / jaljubljubac@hotmail.com -I ., ,

Summary. The paper discusses the general principles of including of the modern Russian neologisms into the derivational system of Russian language. XX -- XXI . , . , : « , , , , » [2: 96]. ( I [4] ) , « » . . [3] (). , 10% , . , 12% [1: 243]. . : 1) , ; « » . . , « » [3, . 2: 917]; ; 2) , , [3] (, , . .); 3) , . . , , ` , , . .' [4: 91]. , , 481 ( . . ) , , , , 375

IX.

`, '. 481, , . . . - : 1. , , . , , , , , ` -. '. 2. , . , ` ', 57 ( [3], 146 ) , (. -) (2 ). 3. , . . ` ', -- `': -, -, -, -, -, -, - / , -, -, -, -, . , ` (, , , ), ' [4: 193]. 4. , . , , ( : 57 245 ). -- I `

, . . , ', : 57 ( ) 435 ( ). [4]. 5. , , , -- [3]. , , -, 264. / -. , , ( ), -- (), ` , ' [4: 147] ` , , . .' , . , . ( ) , , .

1. . . // : / . . . ., 2009. 2. . . // . « ». ., 2006. 3. . . : 2 . 3- ., . . ., 2003. 4. XXI . / . . . . ., 2006.

. .
olalpa@mail.ru , , , ,

Summary. Formation and functioning of compound prefixes is one of the active processes in the field of word-building. Inuneguivocal nature of compound units of language word-building level causes certain difficulties in their interpretation. . , . - (- ) , , . , . . , , . - : - ( , ) - (, ) (), -- ( ) - ( ) , -- - . (), 376 , . : -- ( ) - - ( ) ; ( ) - ( ) ; -- - -- . , , , . , . ( ) , : - - -- ; - -- ; - -- -.

IX.

: - , - , - , - . , , , . , , - -, - - (-) - - (-). . , , - - . ( , ) - -, -. , , , . , . . , . , , , . , , , , . , , , -

. , : -- ( ) ; - ( ) ; - ( ) . , , . , : - ( ), - ( ), - (() -). , . , , , . - - : , , , , (); , , , , . , , . , «» , . . -- .

« »
. .
. . . racib@rambler.ru , , , ,

Summary. In the theses were analyzed international morphemes and models in the Russian word-formation as the reflection of the processes of internationalization. -- « » [3: 29]. «», « , » [2: 183]. - - I , , , : « . , , ., » [3: 30]. «» , , ; -; . , [2: 186]. - . , «- , » [2: 184]. . , . -, -(), -(), , , - : , , , ( ), ( ), (), , , , , , web, , . -- , , 377

IX.

, - , -, -: , , , , , , ; , , , , . - , (, , , , , , , , ); - (-, -, ); - , (, , , , , , , , ); - (, ), (, , , , , , , ); - «», (-, -, -, -, -, -« », -, -, -, -, -). , : (, , , , , ); - (, , , , ); - (-

, , , , , , ); - (, , , ), - (, ), - (), - (, ), - (, ), - (, ), -() (, , , , , , ), -() (, , , ). , : -, , -, -, -; -, - . [3]. , , , « » [1: 72].

1. . // Przejawy internacjonalizacji w jzykach slowiaskich. Siedlce, 2009. 2. . . vs. : // Przejawy internacjonalizacji w jzykach slowiaskich. Siedlce, 2009. 3. . . vs. // Przejawy internacjonalizacji w jzykach slowiaskich. Siedlce, 2009.

. .
. . tatevos@philol.msu.ru

. .
. . . xenkis@mail.ru , , ,

Summary. We argue that superlexical prefixes strained. One of those classes contains prefixes has to be imperfective. Another class of prefixes has to be located below the secondary imperfecti

in Russian fall into two distinct classes that differ as to how their distribution is conthat show a selectional restriction (SR) on co-occurrence with the verb stem: the stem exhibit a positional restriction (PR): in the hierarchical structure of the stem, the prefix ve morpheme --. -, - -, : --. . , , . . - (--, --, -, --), -- . (1). , , (2), , (3). - , . (4) , (5) (6) . . - --. --, , , . (7a-c) , , (8-) -- , . , (8a-c), -

. [BabkoMalaya 1999], [Ramchand 2004], [Svenonius 2004], [DiScuillo, Slabakova 2005], [Romanova 2006], , , , , , , . - ( ), - ( ), - ( ), - ( ), - ( ), - ( ), - () . [Babko-Malaya 1999], [Svenonius 2004] . , , . -- *--, -- *--, -- *-- . . . , , - -, . - , -, -, - -, . - , 378

IX.

, . - . (9) , . . : - , , . (10). . . . (1) a. -[-]IPFV- , . b. , , -[-]IPFV-, . c. , -[-]IPFV- . d. , -[-]IPFV- . (2) a. *-[]PFV- (OK-[[]PFV-]IPFV-) . b. * , -[]PFV- (OK-[[]PFV-]IPFV-) . c. * , -[]PFV- (OK-[[]PFV-]IPFV-) . d. * , -[ ]PFV- (OK-[[ ]PFV-]IPFV-) . (3) a. *-[-]PFV-. b. #-[-]PFV-.

c. *-[]PFV-. d. #-[ ]PFV-. (4) a. -[]IPFV- . b. -[]IPFV-, « ». c. -[]IPFV-. (5) a. -[]PFV- . b. «», -[]PFV-. c. , , -[]PFV-. (6) a. -[-]PFV- . b. -[-]PFV- . c. , -[-]PFV-. (7) a. [[-[]IPFV]PFV-]IPFV- . b. [[-[]IPFV]IPFV-]IPFV- . c. [[-[]IPFV]PFV-]IPFV- . (8) a. [[-[]PFV]PFV-]IPFV- . a. *[-[[-]PFV-]IPFV ]PFV - b. [[-[]PFV]PFV-]IPFV- - . b. *[-[[-]PFV-]IPFV]PFV-. c. , [[-[]PFV]PFV-]IPFV-.] c. *[-[[]PFV-]IPFV]PFV-. (9) a. , , [-[[-[]IPFV]PFV-]IPFV]PFV-, ! b. --[-]IPFV]PFV -]IPFV ]PFV- DVD + RW. c. [-[[-[]IPFV]PFV-]IPFV]PFV- / .

. .
. . . grig72@mail.ru , ,

Summary. The paper is devoted to the derivational correlation of the Russian quasi-etalons in cultural -- cognitive sphere. The special focus is on the productive word-derivating meanings of the quasi-etalons. . , . , . , . , . , . . , , . , , . , . .: `' `' . , . , ` , , - , . .' , . : , , , . . : «, », « », « », « ...», « ...», « », « ...». , . , , , , - (4 ), . , , , , ( , , ), -- . , , , «, » (), , , 379

IX.

, (). « ...», « ...», « », ( / ), (), -- . ( ) ( ) , ,

, . - « ( ) », « »: , . ( ), (.: ). , , .

- :
. .
(--) asimonova@list.ru

Summary. Being fundamentally expressive and having significant semantics, original form and powerful connotation adverbs -- innovations realize the native speakers' pragmatic intent. Depending on the sphere of functioning the adverbs -- innovations may fulfill cognitive, compressive and expressive functions. Functioning actively in the language of literature, mass media, advertisement, the adverbs -- innovations develop new meanings, get new connotations, serve as a word-formation base for new derivatives. The adverbs are extensively used in various language experiments; the brightest of them is the language game. - , . , , . : , -- (, « »). , : -- , , -- (, « »). , . 1. , , . , , . : . , (, «»). , . . 1. ; ( , ) []. , , . , . -- « -», . . , . : . , , (, « »). ... , (, « »). . , , , . - , . . , , : 380 -- , ! - (--, 02.02.2008). : , , , : (, 32, 1996). . . . « , ». , : ! ? (, 17, 2005). «, , ( , )». «», «» (. ., 17.10.2006). . , , ( ): ! (.) -- 2009 (, 2009, 16). , . , -- , . , . : «» (.). 20.40 «» «» (. , 21.11.2005). , ! (). (, 0 6 . 1 2 . 2 0 0 6 ). , : (). « » (, 13.08.2008). : , . : , (TV -- « » « ». : (). «», , «» (. , 24.09.2004).

IX.

: Saab (). Saab-3 2008 : , (, 21.05.2007). - . . . c :

, (. «Ariel»). . , . : «Fanta». - (. «Fanta»); Coca-Cola (. «Coca-Cola»); (. «Dirol»). , , , .

. .
« » tumakoval@rambler.ru , ,

Summary. The report describes the active ways of the formation of new words and the reasons of appearance of new words in modern speech. XX XXI . . , , , . . , , , , ( ). , . . , . , . , , , . , . . . -- --, : ( ), ( ), ( ), ( ) . ( ) , . , . , : ( ), ( ), ( ), ( ), ( ) . . : ( ), ( ) . , , : VIP, PR, CD, DJ. (.: VIP-, VIP-, VIP- .). , ( . . ). . , , - : ( ), ( ), ( ), ( ), ( ) . . , . , , : ( ). , . , : , ( ) . , . , , , , , , . (), . , , . , , .

« »
. .
« » filfak@list.ru , ,

, , ,

. 381

IX.

( ). XIX , « » . . (18631866). , ([3]; [6], .) ([8]; [7], .). , - : [4], - [1] . , : ? , -- , , - . , . , . , , . , , . . -- , . , : . . -- , . , , . -

- . « » [5] , , . . , -- -- . -- -- . , , , . , , , , . , , ( ) , , , , , . , : ( , ) , . .

1. . . // . . 610. , 19952002. 2. . . . . 14. ., 1 9 7 8 . 3. . ., . . . ., 1 9 8 7 . 4. . , 1982. 5. . . 112. , 19832006. 6. . . . . 12. ., 1990. 7. . . . 14. ., 19861987. 8. . . IXVII. ., 19741992.

-
. .
larlarisa@mail.ru , , - ,

Summary. This paper is due to coverimportantissues connected with complex words. New Russian and German composite forms of lexicosemantic group -- naming of special territories and premises from the point of view of their structure and potentials of word-building system are investigated. , - , : , , , , . : , . 382 (. . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . , . . .) , , . - -- ,

IX.

-91, 92, 93, 94, « » . . . (2006), . «Neuer Wortschhatz. Neologismen der 90-er Jahre im Deutschen» (2004), , . , -, , . -- , , . . , «» , . , . -- -- , , : -, -, -, der Servicepoint. , , . . , « » [1: 73]. (-, -, -) (der Fabrikladen, das Euroland); , : -, -, --, -, das Internetcafe, das Cybercafe, das Onlineshopp; , : -, -, , -, -, -, der Einkaufsmall, der Chattraum, das Onlinekaufhaus . « + » ( ). : --, -- . , , - , . , , ( ) , . -

« ». - , , , : -, -, -, -, -, - . , , . . -80 « » . . . . . . . . , . . . , -. . , . , . . , . . . . , - : - (art-), - (audio-), - (bio-), - (video-), (euro-), - (mini-), - (maxi-) . -- : (Klub), (Zentrum), (Saal), (Bar), (Cafe), (Studio), (Pizzeria), (Hotel), (Salon) . , : das Haus, der Raum, die Stube, sad Veirtel ., : Center, Shopp, Mall, Point, Outlet . , , , , .

1. . . // . . , 2002.

.
. .
- Shan_natali@mail.ru , , ,

Summary. Relative adjectives are regarded as a way of forming a syncretic meaning. As a result coherence and cohesion of a poetic text grow. . , , -- -- [7]. , . . (19401994). , , , . , . . , -- . . , . -- <...>. [4: 17]. -. . , . . . [5]. . . . , . [4: 24]. . . , . . 383

IX.

: 1) 2) . , , , . . , « , ». , , , . . <...> , <...> [4: 70]. . , . . . . , , , , . [4: 26]. , , (. ). . . . , - : . , , . , . -- . . . , ,<...> [4: 45]. . .

, , , , , , . , , , -- , <...> [4: 50]. , . , [2]. , «... -- ,," » [6: 28]. , , . . . [4: 19]. , , . . . . , , , .

1. . . - - // http://vsevolodova.ru/content/ view/24/1/1/1/. 2. . . // . ., 1976. . 85102. 3. . . : 3 . . 1. ., 2006. 4. . , , . ; , 1995. 5. . . // http:// www.dialog-21.ru/dialog2007/materials/html/51.htm. 6. . . . ., 2000. 7. . . . , 1996.

. .
. . shchelokovatanya@rambler.ru , , -,

Summary. The paper is devoted to the problem of foreign language borrowings in the sphere of fashion industry vocabulary. The etymological status of various derivatives is defined. Some groups are singled out judging by the origin of the affixes of the borrowings. -- , -- . : , , , , . -- I « » , . «-», . , , «» , . . -, , . : 384 , , . , - « » ( < -- . baseball, < -- . cross, < -- . football, < -- . ballet < . balletto, - < -- . lawn-tennis, -- . kepi); - «- » ( < -- . top, < < . echarpe. ( < -- . cocktail, < -- . cowboy, < -- . Halstuch, < -- . dandy, < -- . pyjamas, < -- . vintage, < -- . glamour. - - « ».

IX.

, ( -- .-. + . , -- .-. + . , -- .-. + . , ). -, . , -, -, , , -, , : Mango, fashion-, fashion-, fashion-, fashion-, street-. , , , - -

( < . coquette). . , , «» «» . . , . . , [1]. , .

1. . . ? // . 1997. 6. . 59.

. .
() nyaroshenko@yandex.ru , , ,

Summary. The report deals with the analysis of proper names (loginonymes) structural peculiarities inside the e-mail addresses. The results of antroponymes transonimization to loginonymes have been established. The most frequency models of the type «antroponym loginonym» have been considered. , , , . . . , . . . , « » [2: 384]. , , , - . , . . , . . , . . (. [1]; [2]; [3]) (, . . ), , , , , -. , . () () , « , () , » [4: 226]. , ( ). , « », « » « ». , « : » ( 2004, 2007) -- 657 -- « ». , , , . , , . , , . . , , 449 657 ( 68%). : 1. , , ( , , . .), -- 238 (53% 449 ). : ninabasko@hotmail.com, lbpar@ mail.ru, olga_alex62@mail.ru, evg-kirov@yandex.ru, likras@mail.ru, zvd@bigmir.net . 2. , () , -- 109 , 24,3%. 3. , (, , - , . .), -- 56 (12,5%). : swetlana@go.ru, masha@ngoc.am, olga@gklass.nsu.ru, olga2003@ok.kz, serjozhka@yahoo.com . , , : 1. ( , , , . .) -- 53 (11,8%). : ninabasko@hotmail.com, nadja.zorikhina@slav.gu.se, irina_shepkina@mail.ru, iryna-koshman@ukr. net . 2. ( , , ) -- 50 (11,1%). : abondarko@aport2000.ru, o_parshina@list.ru, n-alefirenko@yandex.ru, i.magerrramov@mail.ru . , , , , .

1. . . // II . « : », , 1821 2004 . ., 2004. . 394. 2. . . : // III . « : », , 2023 2007 . ., 2007. . 3 8 4 3 8 5 . 3. . . : : . . ... . . . , 2006. 4. . . ( ) // IV . . . «- » (, 910 2009 .). , 2009. . 226227.

385